GSTN Issues Important Advisory Regarding Reset and Re-filing of GSTR-3B for Certain Taxpayers

editor — Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:06:19 +0000

The GSTN has released an important advisory, numbered 629 and dated April 9, 2024, regarding the reset and re-filing of GSTR-3B for specific taxpayers.

Referring to the option for re-filing GSTR-3B for certain taxpayers, it was observed that discrepancies existed between the saved data in the GST system and the data actually filed, particularly concerning ITC availment and tax liabilities. After thorough examination and discussion by the Grievance Redressal Committee of the GST Council, it was decided to reset these returns, providing affected taxpayers with an opportunity to rectify the discrepancies.

As a result, only the affected taxpayers have been notified via their registered email addresses, and the affected returns are accessible on their respective dashboards for re-filing with accurate data. Those who have received this communication are requested to visit their dashboard and re-submit their GSTR-3B within 15 days.

In case of any difficulty in re-filing, taxpayers are advised to contact their jurisdictional tax officer or raise a ticket on the GST grievance redressal portal.

We deeply regret any inconvenience caused to taxpayers.

The complete advisory can be found at: Link to Advisory

Tax Liability cannot be imposed merely because the financial statement did not provide State-wise turnover

editor — Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:14:35 +0000

The imposition of tax liability solely based on the absence of state-wise turnover information in financial statements has been contested in the legal realm. This matter was addressed by the Hon’ble Madras High Court in a recent case involving Tvl. Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) [WP No. 3534 OF 2024, dated February 16, 2024].

Facts:

Tvl. Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) operated as a private general insurance firm, specializing in insurance services. On August 16, 2021, the Petitioner was served with an audit notice by the Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) (FAC) (“the Respondent”). In response, the Petitioner diligently furnished the necessary documents and addressed the discrepancies highlighted in the audit reports. Subsequently, after issuing both an intimation and a show cause notice (“the SCN”), the Competent Authority issued the assessment order on December 30, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”).

Within the Impugned Order, the issue of defect No. 10 arose, relating to variations in turnover between the Profit & Loss account and balance sheet, as opposed to the figures in GSTR-9. The Petitioner explained that these disparities stemmed from the inclusion of Pan-India operations in the financial statements, whereas GSTR-9 solely focused on turnover within Tamil Nadu. The Petitioner even provided a certificate from a Chartered Accountant, specifically outlining the turnover within Tamil Nadu, amounting to Rs. 80,89,05,068/-. However, despite this clarification and despite the Petitioner having already paid taxes on the stated turnover, the Respondent imposed State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) and Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) at 18% each (36% combined) on the aforementioned turnover.

Dissatisfied with the assessment order, the Petitioner sought recourse by filing a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras.

Top of Form

Issue:

The central question revolves around whether tax liability can be established solely due to the absence of state-wise turnover information in financial statements.

Held:

In its ruling on Writ Petition No. 3534 OF 2024, the Hon’ble Madras High Court made the following determinations:

The Court acknowledged the variation in turnover for entities operating across multiple states, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing total turnover from state-wise turnover.
It criticized the Competent Authority's decision to impose GST at a higher rate of 36% instead of the appropriate 18%, despite the Petitioner having already paid tax on the turnover in question.
The Impugned Order was deemed invalid and the case was remanded to the Respondent for reconsideration.
Furthermore, the Court directed the Respondent to afford the Petitioner a fair opportunity, including a personal hearing, and instructed issuance of a fresh assessment order within a maximum period of two months, in compliance with legal provisions.

CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases |

GSTN Issues Important Advisory Regarding Reset and Re-filing of GSTR-3B for Certain Taxpayers

category

Tax Liability cannot be imposed merely because the financial statement did not provide State-wise turnover

category