CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases | https://www.nyca.in ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases Tue, 09 Apr 2024 05:43:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1 https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/9060CA_logo_icai-1.jpg CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases | https://www.nyca.in 32 32 Merely uploading SCN under the category “Additional Notices” instead of “Notices” on the GST portal does not constitute sufficient intimation to the taxpayer https://www.nyca.in/merely-uploading-scn-under-the-category-additional-notices-instead-of-notices-on-the-gst-portal-does-not-constitute-sufficient-intimation-to-the-taxpayer/ https://www.nyca.in/merely-uploading-scn-under-the-category-additional-notices-instead-of-notices-on-the-gst-portal-does-not-constitute-sufficient-intimation-to-the-taxpayer/#respond Tue, 09 Apr 2024 05:43:22 +0000 https://www.nyca.in/?p=8370 The Hon'ble Delhi High Court, in the case of Anhad Impex v. Assistant Commissioner, addressed the issue of whether the misplacement of a Show Cause Notice (SCN)

The post Merely uploading SCN under the category “Additional Notices” instead of “Notices” on the GST portal does not constitute sufficient intimation to the taxpayer appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]>

Introduction:

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court, in the case of Anhad Impex v. Assistant Commissioner, addressed the issue of whether the misplacement of a Show Cause Notice (SCN) in the “Additional Notices” category instead of “Notices” on the GST portal constitutes sufficient intimation to the taxpayer. This analysis examines the court’s findings and the implications for similar cases.

Facts of the Case:

Introduction:

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court, in the case of Anhad Impex v. Assistant Commissioner, addressed the issue of whether the misplacement of a Show Cause Notice (SCN) in the “Additional Notices” category instead of “Notices” on the GST portal constitutes sufficient intimation to the taxpayer. This analysis examines the court’s findings and the implications for similar cases.

Facts of the Case:

  • M/s. Anhad Impex ("the Petitioner") received an Impugned Order dated November 29, 2023, from the Assistant Commissioner ("the Respondent"), creating a demand under Section 73 of the CGST Act.
  • The Petitioner asserted that they never received the SCN, which formed the basis of the Impugned Order, thus depriving them of the opportunity to respond or participate in adjudication proceedings.
  • SCNs are typically uploaded under the "Notices" section on the GST portal, but in this instance, it was placed in the less accessible "Additional Notices" category, leading the Petitioner to miss it.
  • The Respondent contended that uploading the notice on the GST portal suffices as per Section 169 of the CGST Act.

Issue:

Whether the misplacement of the SCN in “Additional Notices” rather than “Notices” warrants the invalidation of the demand order?

Held:

  • The court noted that the Petitioner's lack of response to the SCN indicated a lack of proper and timely intimation.
  • Placing the SCN under "Additional Notices" instead of "Notices" made it less accessible, infringing upon principles of natural justice and provisions of the CGST Act.
  • Referring to precedents such as East Coast Constructions & Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner and Murugesan Jayalakshmi v. State Tax Officer, the court emphasized the importance of proper categorization on the portal.
  • Consequently, the Impugned Order was set aside, with directions for the Petitioner to respond to the SCN, and the Respondent to re-adjudicate the matter with a personal hearing within four weeks.

category

The post Merely uploading SCN under the category “Additional Notices” instead of “Notices” on the GST portal does not constitute sufficient intimation to the taxpayer appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]> https://www.nyca.in/merely-uploading-scn-under-the-category-additional-notices-instead-of-notices-on-the-gst-portal-does-not-constitute-sufficient-intimation-to-the-taxpayer/feed/ 0 Implications of Non-Compliance with GST Return Filing under Section 62 of CGST Act https://www.nyca.in/implications-of-non-compliance-with-gst-return-filing-under-section-62-of-cgst-act/ https://www.nyca.in/implications-of-non-compliance-with-gst-return-filing-under-section-62-of-cgst-act/#comments Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:02:30 +0000 https://www.nyca.in/?p=7970 The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, implemented in India in 2017, mandates registered taxpayers to regularly file returns to declare their taxable supplies and corresponding tax liabilities.

The post Implications of Non-Compliance with GST Return Filing under Section 62 of CGST Act appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]>

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, implemented in India in 2017, mandates registered taxpayers to regularly file returns to declare their taxable supplies and corresponding tax liabilities. However, failure to comply with this obligation can lead to significant consequences under Section 62 of the CGST Act.

Understanding Section 62 of CGST Act:

Subsection (1):

  • Non-Filing Obligations: This subsection comes into effect when a registered taxpayer fails to file the prescribed return under Section 39 (monthly return) or Section 45 (annual return), even after receiving notice under Section 46.
  • Authority of Proper Officer: The designated official empowered by the government can assess the tax liability in the absence of a return by estimating it to the best of their judgment, based on available or gathered information.
  • Assessment Order Issuance: The officer issues a formal assessment order (Form GST-ASMT 13) determining the estimated tax liability, interest, and any applicable penalties.
  • Time Limit: The assessment order must be issued within five years from the due date for filing the annual return for the relevant financial year.

Subsection (2):

  • Rectification Opportunity: Taxpayers have a chance to rectify non-filing by submitting a valid return within 30 days of receiving the assessment order, leading to the withdrawal of the order.
  • Continued Liabilities: Even if the assessment order is withdrawn, the taxpayer remains liable to pay interest and late fees as per Section 50(1) and Section 47 of the CGST Act, respectively.

Additional Provisions:

  • Extension for Filing: Taxpayers have an initial 30-day window to file a return after receiving the assessment order, with an option for an additional 60 days by paying an additional late fee.
  • No Double Jeopardy: Acceptance of the best judgment assessment and payment of determined tax precludes reassessment for the same period.

Penalties under Section 62 of CGST Act:

  • Interest: Interest is levied on the assessed tax liability as per Section 50(1) of the CGST Act.
  • Late Fees: Additional late fees are charged under Section 47 for each day of delay in filing the return.
  • Potential Prosecution: Severe cases of non-compliance may lead to criminal prosecution under Section 132 of the CGST Act.

Consequences of Non-Compliance under Section 62:

  • Assessment Order Issuance: The proper officer issues an assessment order specifying the estimated tax liability, interest, and late fees payable by the taxpayer.
  • Impact on Reputation: Non-compliance can negatively affect the taxpayer's business reputation and future opportunities.

Key Points of Section 62:

  • Applicability: Applies to registered persons failing to file returns under Section 39 or Section 45.
  • Assessment by Proper Officer: The officer estimates tax liability based on available information within a specified time frame.
  • Time Limit for Assessment: Assessment can be initiated within five years from the due date for furnishing the annual return.

Relief for Non-Filers:

  • Rectification Window: Section 62(2) allows non-filers to rectify by filing a valid return within 30 days of receiving the assessment order, with an option for an extended period by paying additional late fees.

Conclusion:

Section 62 of the CGST Act serves as a deterrent against non-filing of GST returns, empowering authorities to assess tax liability and impose penalties. However, it also provides an opportunity for rectification within a stipulated time frame, albeit with certain consequences. Taxpayers are strongly advised to adhere to prescribed deadlines to avoid unnecessary assessments, penalties, and legal complications.

category

The post Implications of Non-Compliance with GST Return Filing under Section 62 of CGST Act appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]> https://www.nyca.in/implications-of-non-compliance-with-gst-return-filing-under-section-62-of-cgst-act/feed/ 4