CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases |

Income Tax Department Cracks Down on Unfiled Returns: 1.52 Crore Individuals Targeted

editor — Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:21:28 +0000

Large Discrepancy Between Taxpayers and Filed Returns

The Income Tax Department is launching a campaign to target individuals who haven’t filed their income tax returns (ITR) despite meeting filing requirements. According to a report in the Economic Times, the department has identified 1.52 crore such individuals.

Data Discrepancies Trigger Action

This initiative stems from a data analysis by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which revealed a significant gap between the total number of taxpayers (8.9 crore in financial year 2022-23) and the number of ITRs filed (7.4 crore, including revised returns). This suggests that potentially 1.97 crore individuals might not have filed their returns even though tax was deducted at source (TDS) from their income.

Focus on High-Value Transactions

The I-T Department is particularly interested in individuals with high bank transactions linked to their PAN cards. Officials will be contacting these individuals to explain the importance of filing ITRs. Additionally, the CBDT has identified nearly 9,000 potential taxpayers who might have made high-value purchases or cash deposits and will be sending them tax notices.

Consequences for Non-Compliance

Individuals who deliberately neglected to file returns will face penalties. However, those with genuine reasons for the sudden increase in income can submit an explanation or file a return to rectify the situation.

Data Analytics Boosts Tax Collection

The Income Tax Department’s access to a vast amount of data has proven instrumental in identifying non-filers and uncovering inconsistencies. This focus on data analysis is credited with contributing to a significant rise (19.88%) in net direct tax collection, exceeding ₹18.90 lakh crore as of March 17th.

Source: https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/it-department-to-tap-1-52-crore-individuals-for-income-tax-return-filing-heres-why-101713003056572.html

category

Investigation of Large Corporations and Multinational Companies under GST Requires ‘Formal Authorization’

editor — Tue, 02 Apr 2024 07:46:09 +0000

The Department of Revenue has issued directives to CGST officials regarding the initiation of investigations into cases involving prominent industrial entities and multinational corporations (MNCs). These guidelines aim to streamline procedures and ensure uniformity in enforcement activities while maintaining the ease of doing business.

These guidelines outline specific scenarios where written approval from the zonal Chief Commissioner is necessary before initiating an investigation or taking action. These include cases involving large corporates, major MNCs, matters already under consideration by the GST Council, or matters seeking to impose taxes or duties on a sector, commodity, or service for the first time under Central excise or GST.

The precise definition of ‘big industrial house’ and major MNCs under these guidelines remains unclear to tax experts. Additionally, the guidelines require CGST field formations to gather details on prevailing trade practices and transaction nature from stakeholders in such cases, ensuring sufficient justification for initiating investigations and actions.

This uniform procedure was introduced following discussions by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) on the necessity for standardized enforcement procedures by CGST field formations, particularly concerning regular taxpayers and their impact on the ease of doing business.

Furthermore, tax officials are instructed to confirm whether any ongoing inquiries relate to the same subject matter or taxpayer by another investigating office or tax administration. This information must be presented to the authority responsible for approving the investigation’s initiation.

Experts believe that the directive addresses industry concerns, emphasizing the importance of effective implementation to promote tax certainty and stability in the business environment.

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/now-gst-probe-into-big-corporates-major-mncs-needs-a-written-approval/article68013343.ece

category

Revenue Department is not empowered to seize Cash under GST

editor — Sat, 30 Mar 2024 10:09:45 +0000

The Delhi High Court, in the matter of Jagdish Bansal v. Union of India [W.P. (C) No. 16677 of 2023 dated February 26, 2024], granted relief to the petitioner by allowing the writ petition. The court instructed the Revenue Department to return the seized cash along with interest. The judgment emphasized that the Revenue Department lacks authority to seize cash under the applicable GST laws.

Facts of the case:

Search and seizure procedures were conducted at the premises of Jagdish Bansal, resulting in the confiscation of cash by the Revenue Department.

Displeased by this action, Jagdish Bansal filed a writ petition in the High Court, challenging the lawfulness of the cash seizure.

Issue:

The central issue at hand was whether the Revenue Department possessed the legal authority to seize cash under the GST framework.

Held:

In its ruling on W.P. (C) NO. 16677 OF 2023, the Delhi High Court made the following determinations:

Referencing the decision of the Delhi High Court in K.M Food Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Through Its Director Mukesh Kapoor Vs Director General DGGI Headquarters [W.P. (C) 328/2024 dated February 13, 2024], the court construed Section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
It observed that cash does not fall under the definition of goods but rather under the definition of money as outlined in Section 2(75) of the CGST Act.
The court reiterated that cash cannot be categorized as goods and therefore cannot be subject to seizure.
It concluded that there was no valid reason for the Revenue Department to retain the seized cash.
Consequently, the court deemed the impugned order as null and directed the Revenue Department to return the seized cash along with interest.

category

SEBI Amends Disclosure Requirements for FPIs with Majority Indian Equity AUM in Corporate Groups

editor — Fri, 22 Mar 2024 05:05:11 +0000

SEBI previously issued a circular on August 24, 2023, mandating extra disclosures for FPIs meeting specific criteria. However, FPIs meeting these criteria were exempted from additional disclosure requirements, provided they met certain conditions. SEBI has now revised this circular. FPIs holding over 50% of their Indian equity AUM within a corporate group are now exempt from additional disclosure obligations, contingent upon fulfilling specific conditions. The revised circular takes immediate effect.

Source: CIRCULAR NO. SEBI/HO/AFD/AFD-POD-2/P/CIR/2024/19

category

Auditor’s Accountability for Audit Trail Reporting

editor — Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:51:21 +0000

An essential aspect of maintaining financial transparency and accuracy is the implementation of an audit trail, which serves as a detailed record tracking the origin and modifications of financial transactions within a system. Auditors are obligated to report on the adequacy and effectiveness of these audit trails, ensuring their integrity and validity.

Significance of Audit Trails

Audit trails offer numerous benefits, including enhanced transparency, improved audit efficiency, fraud detection and prevention, and regulatory compliance across various industries.

Regulations Mandating Reporting on Audit Trails

Specific regulations, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and International Standards on Auditing (ISAs), require auditors to assess and report on audit trails. Industry-specific regulations also dictate additional requirements for audit trail functionality and reporting.

Auditor’s Assessment and Reporting on Audit Trails

Auditors assess various aspects of audit trails, including their existence, functionality, accessibility, retention, and management’s controls. These evaluations contribute to the overall assurance process and provide valuable insights into an entity’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Reporting Mechanisms for Auditors

Auditors report their findings on audit trails through mechanisms like auditor’s reports, management letters, or formal communication to regulatory bodies, depending on the specific situation and identified issues.

Conclusion

Reporting obligations on auditors regarding audit trails are crucial for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of financial information. As regulations evolve to emphasize data integrity, effective reporting by auditors on audit trails remains prominent, promoting transparency and trust in financial statements.

category