CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases |

GST Council Meeting: GSTAT to Adjudicate Anti-Profiteering

editor — Thu, 20 Jun 2024 06:32:26 +0000

In its meeting on Saturday, the GST Council is likely to authorize the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) to adjudicate cases related to anti-profiteering and to introduce a “sunset date,” allowing complaints to be filed only until April 1, 2025.

This decision follows a recommendation from the law committee under the GST Council, prompted by the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) declaration that handling such matters is beyond its core functions.

Since December 1, 2022, the CCI has disposed of only 27 cases, with approximately 140 cases awaiting adjudication. Furthermore, 184 cases are pending in various high courts, challenging previous authority orders.

Under GST law, anti-profiteering provisions mandate suppliers of goods and services to pass on tax rate reduction benefits or input tax credit advantages to recipients through proportionate price reductions.

Established in November 2017, the National Anti-Profiteering Authority was tasked with preventing unfair profiteering by registered suppliers. It was merged into the CCI on December 1, 2022.

The NAA imposed penalties on more than 100 companies, including Hindustan Unilever, Patanjali, Jubilant Foodworks, Reckitt Benckiser, Phillips, Gillette India, Procter and Gamble Home Products, among others, who challenged the anti-profiteering provisions in the High Court. The matter is now pending in the Supreme Court after the High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the provision.

The law panel proposed the sunset date, citing the stabilization of the transition to the GST regime. It noted that pricing influenced by market forces is ideal, rather than legislative control. Initially introduced with a five-year tenure, the anti-profiteering provisions were extended.

Experts suggest that a sunset clause, along with timelines for resolving existing disputes, would provide clarity for businesses by removing uncertainties associated with these provisions.

To enforce this, the principal bench of GSTAT will be mandated with the specified date after which no new anti-profiteering cases will be entertained. Subsequently, cases may be transferred among benches nationwide. The GST tribunal is expected to commence operations soon with the appointment of members by the government.

Source: Business Standard

category

GSTN’s Digitization of Dispute Resolution Process

editor — Mon, 03 Jun 2024 06:57:55 +0000

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) is set to fully digitize the entire dispute resolution process via appeal to the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), a senior official informed FE. A dedicated portal is expected to be operational before all benches of the tribunal become fully functional.

Earlier reports by FE indicated that the government aims to activate all GSTAT benches by January 2025 to address the substantial backlog of pending GST-related disputes at the appellate level. The principal bench, located in New Delhi, is anticipated to commence operations from July-August.

According to a response from the finance ministry to the Parliament, there were 14,227 appeals against disputed tax demands raised by Central GST authorities as of June 2023.

On May 6, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman administered the oath to Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, former chief justice of Jharkhand High Court, as the President of GSTAT.

GSTAT, established under the Central GST Act, 2017, serves as the appellate authority to hear appeals against orders of the first appellate authority. It comprises a Principal Bench in New Delhi and multiple state benches, with 31 state benches notified across the country as per GST Council approval.

Tax experts anticipate that the digital portal will streamline appeals through electronic filing, reducing paperwork and administrative burden. This move is expected to expedite the overall litigation process, leading to quicker resolution of appeals and revenue liquidation.

Experts highlight benefits for taxpayers in terms of tracking appeals and accessing past orders, ensuring transparency and efficiency. They also expect GSTAT members to make faster and more informed decisions with quick access to precedents.

While acknowledging the ambitious vision, experts caution that full implementation may require time. They suggest increasing GSTAT benches and appointing additional qualified members to handle the backlog. Implementing strict timelines for hearing and resolving appeals, along with leveraging artificial intelligence tools, could further expedite the process.

Source: https://www.financialexpress.com/business/industry-gst-appeal-process-to-be-fully-digitised-3510235/

category

All Benches of GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) May Start Functioning by January 2025

editor — Sat, 11 May 2024 04:45:13 +0000

Introduction

The government’s initiative to operationalize all benches of the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) by January 2025 is poised to address the backlog of pending GST-related disputes at the appellate level. This move is anticipated to streamline the adjudication process and bolster the confidence of taxpayers in the judicial system.

Government’s Initiative for Operationalizing GSTAT Benches

The government aims to alleviate the significant backlog of pending GST-related disputes by ensuring the operationalization of all benches of the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) by January 2025.

Appointment of President for GSTAT

Former Chief Justice of Jharkhand High Court, Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, has been appointed as the President of GSTAT. His appointment marks the beginning of the operationalization of GSTAT, a vital institution for resolving GST-related disputes.

Significance of GSTAT Operationalization

The expeditious operationalization of GSTATs holds immense importance in bolstering the confidence of taxpayers in the judicial system. It is expected to mitigate overall litigation time and costs, thereby providing timely relief to taxpayers.

Composition of GSTAT

GSTAT is the appellate authority established under the Central GST Act, 2017. It comprises a Principal Bench in New Delhi and various state benches. The government has notified 31 state benches across the country.

Role of Judicial and Technical Members

GSTAT consists of judicial members with a background in law and judicial experience, along with technical members possessing expertise in taxation, finance, accounting, or economics. This combination ensures a comprehensive approach to resolving GST-related appeals.

Importance of Efficient Case Management

Efficient case management systems and procedural rules are essential for expediting the processing of appeals. GSTATs can leverage technology to streamline administrative tasks and facilitate electronic communication between the tribunal, appellants, and tax authorities.

Clarification on Limitation Period

The government needs to clarify the “limitation period” for filing appeals to GSTAT, ensuring that taxpayers do not face undue stress due to expired limitation periods amidst the ongoing process of appointments in GSTAT.

Need for Timely Functioning of GSTAT

Timely functioning of GSTAT is imperative to prevent expiration of limitation periods for filing appeals, thereby avoiding unnecessary stress for taxpayers and minimizing avoidable litigation.

Source: https://www.financialexpress.com/business/industry-all-benches-of-gstat-may-start-functioning-by-january-2025-3482602/

category

After 7-year wait, GST Appellate Tribunal may finally be operational soon

editor — Fri, 10 May 2024 09:49:28 +0000

Introduction

In a significant development, the appointment of Justice (retd) Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as the first president of the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) marks a crucial step towards operationalizing the long-awaited tribunal. However, legal experts emphasize the urgent need for the appointment of judicial and technical members to expedite its full functionality.

Understanding the Significance of GSTAT

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), a pivotal institution in the realm of taxation, has been in the pipeline for nearly seven years following its inception through parliamentary legislation in 2017. However, administrative hurdles have impeded its notification and subsequent operationalization.

Challenges Faced in Operationalizing GSTAT

One of the primary challenges hindering the operationalization of GSTAT has been the delay in appointing requisite judicial and technical members, critical for its functioning. Without these appointments, the tribunal’s judicial functions remain dormant, prolonging the resolution of pending GST appeals.

The Appointment of Justice (retd) Sanjaya Kumar Mishra

The recent appointment of Justice (retd) Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as the president of GSTAT signifies a significant milestone in its journey towards functionality. Mishra’s role as the administrative head holds promise in expediting further appointments and streamlining the tribunal’s operations.

Understanding the Composition of GSTAT

To comprehend the functioning of GSTAT, it’s imperative to delineate its structural framework and operational mandate.

Judicial and Technical Members

Bench strength is crucial for the effective functioning of GSTAT, necessitating the appointment of both judicial and technical members. Judicial members bring expertise in legal proceedings, while technical members specialize in the pertinent laws under consideration.

Importance of Bench Composition

The composition of benches across various locations is pivotal for ensuring accessibility and efficiency in adjudicating GST-related disputes. The establishment of a principal bench in Delhi, supplemented by 31 regional benches, underscores GSTAT’s expansive jurisdiction and reach.

Legislative Backing and Recent Reforms

The enactment of the Central Goods and Services Tax (Second Amendment) Bill, 2023, marks a legislative milestone in facilitating the establishment of GSTAT. The bill’s provisions, including revisions in age limits for tribunal members, align with broader tribunal reforms aimed at enhancing efficiency and effectiveness.

Implications and Challenges Ahead

While the appointment of the GSTAT president herald’s optimism, several challenges loom on the horizon, necessitating proactive measures for effective resolution.

Addressing Pending Litigation

With a backlog of over 14,000 GST appeals, GSTAT faces the daunting task of addressing accumulated litigation swiftly. Leveraging digitization and virtual platforms for hearings can expedite the resolution process and alleviate the burden on high courts.

Innovative Approaches for Expedited Disposal

To ensure timely disposal of appeals, GSTAT must explore innovative approaches such as clubbing similar appeals and adopting streamlined procedures. This proactive stance can mitigate delays and enhance stakeholder confidence in the tribunal’s efficacy.

Source: https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/after-7-year-wait-gst-appellate-tribunal-may-finally-be-operational-soon-12717394.html

category

GST Appellate Tribunal: Your Guide to Seeking Redressal

editor — Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:48:09 +0000

In the intricate web of tax laws, disputes are inevitable. When faced with an unfavorable order under Section 107 or 108, individuals or entities have the right to appeal to the GST Appellate Tribunal. However, what happens when there’s no Tribunal in place? This article delves into the recourse available and the steps to take in such scenarios.

Understanding Section 112 Appeals

Sec. 112: What It Entails

Section 112 of the GST Act grants individuals aggrieved by orders under Sections 107 or 108 the right to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. This avenue serves as a crucial mechanism for seeking redressal against adverse decisions.

Navigating the Absence of a Tribunal

Step 1: Depositing 20% of the Disputed Amount

In the absence of a functioning Tribunal, individuals seeking to appeal must first deposit 20% of the disputed amount. This step is pivotal and serves as a precursor to initiating the appeals process.

Step 2: Communication with the Department

Following the deposit, it’s imperative to formally communicate with the concerned department regarding the intent to file an appeal before the Tribunal. This ensures transparency and adherence to procedural requirements.

Legal Precedents and Directives

Bombay High Court’s Directive

In a notable case involving Gulf Oil Lubricants India Ltd., the Bombay High Court directed the State Government to address the issue of non-constitution of the GST Tribunal. This directive underscores the significance of establishing a functional appellate mechanism.

Circulars from State GST Authorities

Both Maharashtra and Kerala GST authorities have issued circulars addressing the absence of a Tribunal. These directives provide guidelines and insights into navigating the legal landscape amidst Tribunal unavailability.

Insights from High Court Judgments

Trimurthi Pvt. Ltd.

Introduction

In the legal battle between Trimurti Private Limited and the State of Bihar, the Patna High Court steps in to address a critical issue—the non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act. This article offers a comprehensive analysis of the court’s judgment and its implications for both the petitioner and the state authorities.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, Trimurti Private Limited, seeks relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, intending to exercise the statutory remedy of appeal against an impugned order. However, the absence of the Appellate Tribunal obstructs this recourse, as outlined in Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act.

Issue

The core issue revolves around the unavailability of the Appellate Tribunal, which deprives the petitioner of the right to appeal against the disputed order under the GST Act.

Held

The Patna High Court acknowledges the respondent State authorities’ admission regarding the non-constitution of the Tribunal. In response, a notification is issued to alleviate this challenge, stipulating that the period for filing an appeal before the Tribunal shall commence only upon its constitution.

The court exercises its discretion by granting a conditional stay on the recovery of the remaining tax amount. To benefit from this stay, the petitioner must deposit 20 percent of the disputed amount, in addition to the previous deposit under Section 107 of the B.G.S.T. Act. This relief is granted due to the Tribunal’s non-constitution by the respondents, aligning with precedents set in similar cases.

However, the court underscores that the stay is not indefinite. It mandates that upon the Tribunal’s constitution and functionality, the petitioner must file the appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act, adhering to statutory obligations.

Should the petitioner opt not to pursue the remedy within the specified period post-Tribunal constitution, the respondent authorities are empowered to proceed further within the bounds of the law. Additionally, the court’s order entails the release of any bank account attachment upon fulfillment of the specified conditions.

Jaskaran Lunawat

Introduction

The Calcutta High Court recently intervened in recovery proceedings related to the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In the case of Jaskaran Lunawat Vs State of West Bengal & Ors., the court granted a stay without pre-deposit, citing the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal.

Facts of the case

The writ petition was filed challenging an Appeal Order under Section 107 of the GST Acts for the period 2019-2020. The petitioner sought a stay on the implementation of the Appeal Order until the GST Tribunal became functional. The petitioner relied on a Bombay High Court judgment and a Calcutta High Court order, asserting that pre-deposit conditions specified in Section 112(8) of the Act were not mandatory in certain circumstances.

Issue

The issue in the case of Jaskaran Lunawat Vs State of West Bengal & Ors. before the Calcutta High Court revolves around the non-constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT). The petitioner sought a stay on the implementation of an Appeal Order under Section 107 of the GST Acts, citing the absence of a functional tribunal. The key issue is whether the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal justifies granting a stay without pre-deposit, as mandated by Section 112(8) of the Act.

Held

After hearing both parties, the court noted that the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal should not allow revenue authorities to take advantage and realize the demanded amount. The court disposed of the petition with specific orders to protect the petitioner’s interests.

N.G. Enterprises

Introduction

In a recent ruling, the Allahabad High Court intervened in a tax dispute under the CGST Act, ordering a stay on recovery proceedings and mandating the deposit of 20% of the disputed tax liability. The judgment reflects the Court’s stance on interim relief in such cases.

Facts of the Case

The case involves a tax dispute under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act. The Allahabad High Court issued a ruling ordering a stay on recovery proceedings. The Court mandated the deposit of 20% of the disputed tax liability.

Issue

The key issue in this case is whether the Allahabad High Court’s intervention in the tax dispute and its directive to mandate a 20% deposit of the disputed tax liability is appropriate under the CGST Act.

Held

The Allahabad High Court’s decision reflects its stance on interim relief in tax disputes under the CGST Act. Drawing reference to previous orders and judgments, the Court deemed it appropriate to order a stay on recovery proceedings and mandate a deposit of 20% of the disputed tax liability. This ruling aims to balance the interests of both the tax authorities and the taxpayers, providing relief to taxpayers while safeguarding the interests of revenue authorities. Additionally, the Court emphasized procedural fairness by requiring respondents to file counter-affidavits within a specified timeline, ensuring a comprehensive consideration of all arguments before reaching a final decision.

Conclusion

In the absence of a GST Appellate Tribunal, individuals must navigate legal complexities with caution. By adhering to procedural requirements, seeking interim relief, and leveraging legal directives, taxpayers can mitigate the impact of Tribunal unavailability on their appeals.

category