<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases | </title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.nyca.in/tag/gst-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.nyca.in</link>
	<description>ITR Filing 2023 &#124; Company Registration &#124; NGO Registration &#124; Income Tax Raid Cases &#124; Audit &#124; Inc Incroporation &#124; CPA in India &#124; Subsidy &#124;  Project Funding &#124; GST &#124; GST Raid Cases &#124; Income Tax Notice Faceless &#124; DRI Cases</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 06:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>HC rejects appeal over reversal of input tax credit on fraudulent supplies</title>
		<link>https://www.nyca.in/hc-rejects-appeal-over-reversal-of-input-tax-credit-on-fraudulent-supplies/</link>
					<comments>https://www.nyca.in/hc-rejects-appeal-over-reversal-of-input-tax-credit-on-fraudulent-supplies/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 06:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraudulent supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genuine transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC rejects appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITC benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-existent firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty and interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reversal of input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nyca.in/?p=9892</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ruling highlights strict adherence to GST laws, invalidating ITC claims on fraudulent supply transactions.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/hc-rejects-appeal-over-reversal-of-input-tax-credit-on-fraudulent-supplies/">HC rejects appeal over reversal of input tax credit on fraudulent supplies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="9892" class="elementor elementor-9892">
						<section class="has_eae_slider elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-74094136 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default parallax_section_no qode_elementor_container_no" data-eae-slider="9008" data-id="74094136" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-66 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-21698713" data-eae-slider="9712" data-id="21698713" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-6c81353e elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="6c81353e" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
															<img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HC-Rejects-Appeal-Over-Reversal-Of-Input-Tax-Credit-On-Fraudulent-Supplies-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-9895" alt="" srcset="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HC-Rejects-Appeal-Over-Reversal-Of-Input-Tax-Credit-On-Fraudulent-Supplies-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HC-Rejects-Appeal-Over-Reversal-Of-Input-Tax-Credit-On-Fraudulent-Supplies-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HC-Rejects-Appeal-Over-Reversal-Of-Input-Tax-Credit-On-Fraudulent-Supplies-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HC-Rejects-Appeal-Over-Reversal-Of-Input-Tax-Credit-On-Fraudulent-Supplies-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HC-Rejects-Appeal-Over-Reversal-Of-Input-Tax-Credit-On-Fraudulent-Supplies-700x394.jpg 700w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HC-Rejects-Appeal-Over-Reversal-Of-Input-Tax-Credit-On-Fraudulent-Supplies-539x303.jpg 539w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HC-Rejects-Appeal-Over-Reversal-Of-Input-Tax-Credit-On-Fraudulent-Supplies.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />															</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-337b71cd elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="337b71cd" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p style="font-weight: 400;">The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a petition filed by a firm against penalty, interest imposed on it, and reversal of input tax credit (ITC) on inward supplies of goods by non-existent firms.</p><p style="font-weight: 400;">The court upheld the order passed by the Additional Commissioner in this regard.</p><p style="font-weight: 400;">The court observed, &#8220;fraud vitiates even the most solemn proceedings and the mere fact that the ITC benefit had earlier been granted to the assessee merely because the firms were then registered, would not create any estoppel against the authority taking appropriate action for claiming refund of the benefit wrongly availed&#8221;.</p><p style="font-weight: 400;">The assessee is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of aluminium casting and machinery parts and, during a survey of the place of business, it was found that it claimed to have received inward supplies from three firms and claimed ITC on such inward supplies.</p><p style="font-weight: 400;">After availing of ITC by the assessee, an enquiry was conducted by the Special Investigation Branch (SIB) and it came to light that the firms from which the assessee claimed to have received inward supplies were non-existent and bogus.</p><p style="font-weight: 400;">However, the assessee submitted that it had actually received inward supplies, which is established from the records produced before the adjudicating authority, and the supplier firms had valid GSTIN registration when it had received the supplies. The assessee claimed that in case the GSTIN registration of the firm is cancelled subsequently, his firm cannot be penalised for the same.</p><p style="font-weight: 400;">The court said that merely because the firms were registered on the date of the transaction, it cannot be said that the department is bound to give ITC benefit to the assessee, even though it has been revealed later that the firms were non-existent, and they could not have made actual supplies.</p><p style="font-weight: 400;">An expert said the court&#8217;s ruling underscored the critical requirement for businesses to engage in genuine transactions when claiming ITC. This judgement serves as a stern warning against fraudulent practices and reinforces the necessity for strict adherence to GST laws.</p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-466d7f6c elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="466d7f6c" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Source:</strong> <span style="color: #99ccff;"><a style="font-weight: 500; color: #99ccff;" href="https://www.business-standard.com/india-news/hc-rejects-appeal-over-reversal-of-input-tax-credit-on-fraudulent-supplies-124052201468_1.html" aria-invalid="true" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.business-standard.com/india-news/hc-rejects-appeal-over-reversal-of-input-tax-credit-on-fraudulent-supplies-124052201468_1.html</a></span></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
				<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-33 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-43c1db0e" data-eae-slider="97316" data-id="43c1db0e" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-63733f1a elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="63733f1a" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="heading.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">category</h2>				</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-5493b786 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="5493b786" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><ul class='catlistsidebar'>	<li class="cat-item cat-item-14"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/company-law/">Corporate &amp; Allied Laws</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/income-tax/">Direct Tax</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-18"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/business-india/">Doing Business in India</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-13"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/gst/">GST</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-17"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/budget/">India Budget</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/news/">News</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-15"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/startup/">StartUp</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-16"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/subsidy-schemes/">Subsidy &amp; Schemes</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/monthly-updates/">The ReCap &#8211; Monthly News Letter</a>
</li>
</ul></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/hc-rejects-appeal-over-reversal-of-input-tax-credit-on-fraudulent-supplies/">HC rejects appeal over reversal of input tax credit on fraudulent supplies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.nyca.in/hc-rejects-appeal-over-reversal-of-input-tax-credit-on-fraudulent-supplies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court of Gujarat Rules on GST Case</title>
		<link>https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/</link>
					<comments>https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gujarat Court Verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Gujarat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Pronouncement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juridical Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Precedent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statutory Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Regulations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nyca.in/?p=8214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a significant legal development, the High Court of Gujarat has recently issued a noteworthy ruling in the case of OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/">High Court of Gujarat Rules on GST Case</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="8214" class="elementor elementor-8214">
						<section class="has_eae_slider elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-1b2d4c87 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default parallax_section_no qode_elementor_container_no" data-eae-slider="82904" data-id="1b2d4c87" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-66 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-7636c4f4" data-eae-slider="33256" data-id="7636c4f4" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-7460b05d elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="7460b05d" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
															<img decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-8217" alt="" srcset="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-700x394.jpg 700w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-539x303.jpg 539w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />															</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-255e4d56 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="255e4d56" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="flex-1 overflow-hidden"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-79elbk h-full"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-1n7m0yu"><div class="flex flex-col pb-9 text-sm"><div class="w-full text-token-text-primary" data-testid="conversation-turn-11"><div class="px-4 py-2 justify-center text-base md:gap-6 m-auto"><div class="flex flex-1 text-base mx-auto gap-3 md:px-5 lg:px-1 xl:px-5 md:max-w-3xl lg:max-w-[40rem] xl:max-w-[48rem] group final-completion"><div class="relative flex w-full flex-col agent-turn"><div class="flex-col gap-1 md:gap-3"><div class="flex flex-grow flex-col max-w-full"><div class="min-h-[20px] text-message flex flex-col items-start gap-3 whitespace-pre-wrap break-words [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-5 overflow-x-auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="d2dc8340-8bc0-4c46-a48f-59179bbab82c"><div class="markdown prose w-full break-words dark:prose-invert light"><p>In a significant legal development, the High Court of Gujarat has recently issued a noteworthy ruling in the case of OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA. This ruling addresses a crucial aspect pertaining to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, particularly focusing on the retrospective application of amendments to Rule 108 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The case, denoted as R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13209/210/212/213/215 of 2023, reached its culmination on 27th March 2024.</p><p><strong>Facts of the Case:</strong></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-4442a727 elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="4442a727" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The petitioner, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT LTD, contested against the UNION OF INDIA, asserting that Rule 108(3) of the CGST Rules should not be applicable in their situation. They contended that their online appeals were based on the Order-in-Original made available by the adjudicating authority.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The crux of the issue revolved around the requirement for the petitioner to submit the decision or order being appealed against within seven days of filing the appeal under sub-rule (1) of Rule 108, and the subsequent issuance of a final acknowledgment by the appellate authority indicating the appeal number.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-adc45b2 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="adc45b2" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Held:</strong></p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-6da56113 elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="6da56113" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The High Court determined that the petitioner was indeed obligated to adhere to the stipulated timeline for submitting the decision or order appealed against, as outlined in Rule 108.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">While acknowledging the justifiability of the appellate authority's rejection of appeals due to delays, the Court referenced the Minutes of the 48th Meeting of the GST Council. This documented the Council's acceptance of recommendations put forth by the Law Committee.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">According to these recommendations, when an order subject to appeal is issued or uploaded on the common portal and is accessible to the appellate authority, the necessity for the appellant to furnish a certified copy of such an uploaded order becomes inconsequential due to its online availability.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Consequently, the retrospective effect of the amendment to Rule 108, effective from 26th December 2022, was affirmed by the Court as being clarificatory in nature.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">In light of this clarification, the impugned order passed by the appellate authority rejecting the appeal on grounds of delay was deemed untenable. Therefore, the High Court proceeded to quash and set aside the impugned order.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
				<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-33 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-1d74df5" data-eae-slider="5660" data-id="1d74df5" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-5fb58e70 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="5fb58e70" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="heading.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">category</h2>				</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-174f0b7b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="174f0b7b" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><ul class='catlistsidebar'>	<li class="cat-item cat-item-14"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/company-law/">Corporate &amp; Allied Laws</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/income-tax/">Direct Tax</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-18"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/business-india/">Doing Business in India</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-13"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/gst/">GST</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-17"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/budget/">India Budget</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/news/">News</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-15"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/startup/">StartUp</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-16"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/subsidy-schemes/">Subsidy &amp; Schemes</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/monthly-updates/">The ReCap &#8211; Monthly News Letter</a>
</li>
</ul></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/">High Court of Gujarat Rules on GST Case</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
