<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases | </title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.nyca.in/tag/landmark-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.nyca.in</link>
	<description>ITR Filing 2023 &#124; Company Registration &#124; NGO Registration &#124; Income Tax Raid Cases &#124; Audit &#124; Inc Incroporation &#124; CPA in India &#124; Subsidy &#124;  Project Funding &#124; GST &#124; GST Raid Cases &#124; Income Tax Notice Faceless &#124; DRI Cases</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:55:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Delhi High Court Orders Refund of ₹35 Lakh to GST Petitioner, Emphasizing Voluntary Compliance and Due Process</title>
		<link>https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/</link>
					<comments>https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST petitioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Legal System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal perspective.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Precedent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal victory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refund ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax refund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voluntary compliance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nyca.in/?p=8511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Delhi High Court's decision mandates a refund of ₹35 lakh to a GST petitioner, underscoring the significance of voluntary compliance and adherence to due process.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/">Delhi High Court Orders Refund of ₹35 Lakh to GST Petitioner, Emphasizing Voluntary Compliance and Due Process</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="8511" class="elementor elementor-8511">
						<section class="has_eae_slider elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-54c83f11 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default parallax_section_no qode_elementor_container_no" data-eae-slider="61042" data-id="54c83f11" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-66 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-25dd7777" data-eae-slider="86958" data-id="25dd7777" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-36c22c2e elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="36c22c2e" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
															<img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-8514" alt="" srcset="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-700x394.jpg 700w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-539x303.jpg 539w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />															</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-32c74c87 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="32c74c87" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="flex-1 overflow-hidden"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-79elbk h-full"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-1n7m0yu"><div class="flex flex-col pb-9 text-sm"><div class="w-full text-token-text-primary" data-testid="conversation-turn-11"><div class="px-4 py-2 justify-center text-base md:gap-6 m-auto"><div class="flex flex-1 text-base mx-auto gap-3 md:px-5 lg:px-1 xl:px-5 md:max-w-3xl lg:max-w-[40rem] xl:max-w-[48rem] group final-completion"><div class="relative flex w-full flex-col agent-turn"><div class="flex-col gap-1 md:gap-3"><div class="flex flex-grow flex-col max-w-full"><div class="min-h-[20px] text-message flex flex-col items-start gap-3 whitespace-pre-wrap break-words [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-5 overflow-x-auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="d2dc8340-8bc0-4c46-a48f-59179bbab82c"><div class="markdown prose w-full break-words dark:prose-invert light"><p><strong>Introduction:</strong></p><p>The Delhi High Court&#8217;s decision mandates a refund of ₹35 lakh to a GST petitioner, underscoring the significance of voluntary compliance and adherence to due process.</p><p><strong>Facts of the Case:</strong></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-35631f0a elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="35631f0a" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">On January 6, 2023, the petitioner underwent a search operation based on allegations of suppressed transactions, excessive input tax credit claims, and GST evasion.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The search, conducted on January 7, 2023, compelled the petitioner to reverse an Input Tax Credit of ₹35,00,000 using FORM GST DRC-03.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-7dcbeedd elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="7dcbeedd" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Issue:</strong></p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-6887892f elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="6887892f" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The central issue pertained to whether the amount recovered during the search operation was voluntarily deposited or coerced, necessitating a refund.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-221a6cf4 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="221a6cf4" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Held:</strong></p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-1f424a39 elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="1f424a39" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Petitioner's Argument: Citing precedent cases, the petitioner argued that the deposit was made involuntarily under coercion, warranting a refund with interest.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Respondent's Argument: The respondent contended that the deposit was voluntary and proceeded with recovery under Section 73 of the GST Act through a Show Cause Notice.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Court Judgment: The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the refund of ₹35,00,000 with 6% interest per annum from the date of deposit. The court deemed the deposit as non-voluntary and contrary to guidelines issued by the CBIC.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
				<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-33 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-404576d0" data-eae-slider="22751" data-id="404576d0" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-4c5fd799 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="4c5fd799" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="heading.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">category</h2>				</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-2fe25511 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="2fe25511" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><ul class='catlistsidebar'>	<li class="cat-item cat-item-14"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/company-law/">Corporate &amp; Allied Laws</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/income-tax/">Direct Tax</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-18"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/business-india/">Doing Business in India</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-13"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/gst/">GST</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-17"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/budget/">India Budget</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/news/">News</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-15"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/startup/">StartUp</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-16"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/subsidy-schemes/">Subsidy &amp; Schemes</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/monthly-updates/">The ReCap &#8211; Monthly News Letter</a>
</li>
</ul></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/">Delhi High Court Orders Refund of ₹35 Lakh to GST Petitioner, Emphasizing Voluntary Compliance and Due Process</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court of Gujarat Rules on GST Case</title>
		<link>https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/</link>
					<comments>https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gujarat Court Verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Gujarat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Pronouncement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juridical Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Precedent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statutory Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Regulations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nyca.in/?p=8214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a significant legal development, the High Court of Gujarat has recently issued a noteworthy ruling in the case of OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/">High Court of Gujarat Rules on GST Case</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="8214" class="elementor elementor-8214">
						<section class="has_eae_slider elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-1b2d4c87 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default parallax_section_no qode_elementor_container_no" data-eae-slider="71184" data-id="1b2d4c87" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-66 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-7636c4f4" data-eae-slider="91631" data-id="7636c4f4" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-7460b05d elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="7460b05d" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
															<img decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-8217" alt="" srcset="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-700x394.jpg 700w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case-539x303.jpg 539w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/High-Court-Of-Gujarat-Rules-On-GST-Case.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />															</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-255e4d56 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="255e4d56" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="flex-1 overflow-hidden"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-79elbk h-full"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-1n7m0yu"><div class="flex flex-col pb-9 text-sm"><div class="w-full text-token-text-primary" data-testid="conversation-turn-11"><div class="px-4 py-2 justify-center text-base md:gap-6 m-auto"><div class="flex flex-1 text-base mx-auto gap-3 md:px-5 lg:px-1 xl:px-5 md:max-w-3xl lg:max-w-[40rem] xl:max-w-[48rem] group final-completion"><div class="relative flex w-full flex-col agent-turn"><div class="flex-col gap-1 md:gap-3"><div class="flex flex-grow flex-col max-w-full"><div class="min-h-[20px] text-message flex flex-col items-start gap-3 whitespace-pre-wrap break-words [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-5 overflow-x-auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="d2dc8340-8bc0-4c46-a48f-59179bbab82c"><div class="markdown prose w-full break-words dark:prose-invert light"><p>In a significant legal development, the High Court of Gujarat has recently issued a noteworthy ruling in the case of OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA. This ruling addresses a crucial aspect pertaining to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, particularly focusing on the retrospective application of amendments to Rule 108 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The case, denoted as R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13209/210/212/213/215 of 2023, reached its culmination on 27th March 2024.</p><p><strong>Facts of the Case:</strong></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-4442a727 elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="4442a727" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The petitioner, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT LTD, contested against the UNION OF INDIA, asserting that Rule 108(3) of the CGST Rules should not be applicable in their situation. They contended that their online appeals were based on the Order-in-Original made available by the adjudicating authority.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The crux of the issue revolved around the requirement for the petitioner to submit the decision or order being appealed against within seven days of filing the appeal under sub-rule (1) of Rule 108, and the subsequent issuance of a final acknowledgment by the appellate authority indicating the appeal number.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-adc45b2 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="adc45b2" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Held:</strong></p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-6da56113 elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="6da56113" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The High Court determined that the petitioner was indeed obligated to adhere to the stipulated timeline for submitting the decision or order appealed against, as outlined in Rule 108.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">While acknowledging the justifiability of the appellate authority's rejection of appeals due to delays, the Court referenced the Minutes of the 48th Meeting of the GST Council. This documented the Council's acceptance of recommendations put forth by the Law Committee.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">According to these recommendations, when an order subject to appeal is issued or uploaded on the common portal and is accessible to the appellate authority, the necessity for the appellant to furnish a certified copy of such an uploaded order becomes inconsequential due to its online availability.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Consequently, the retrospective effect of the amendment to Rule 108, effective from 26th December 2022, was affirmed by the Court as being clarificatory in nature.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">In light of this clarification, the impugned order passed by the appellate authority rejecting the appeal on grounds of delay was deemed untenable. Therefore, the High Court proceeded to quash and set aside the impugned order.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
				<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-33 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-1d74df5" data-eae-slider="90060" data-id="1d74df5" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-5fb58e70 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="5fb58e70" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="heading.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">category</h2>				</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-174f0b7b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="174f0b7b" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><ul class='catlistsidebar'>	<li class="cat-item cat-item-14"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/company-law/">Corporate &amp; Allied Laws</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/income-tax/">Direct Tax</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-18"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/business-india/">Doing Business in India</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-13"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/gst/">GST</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-17"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/budget/">India Budget</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/news/">News</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-15"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/startup/">StartUp</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-16"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/subsidy-schemes/">Subsidy &amp; Schemes</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/monthly-updates/">The ReCap &#8211; Monthly News Letter</a>
</li>
</ul></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/">High Court of Gujarat Rules on GST Case</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.nyca.in/high-court-of-gujarat-rules-on-gst-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madras High Court Strikes Down Excessive GST Demand on Trade Payables</title>
		<link>https://www.nyca.in/madras-high-court-strikes-down-excessive-gst-demand-on-trade-payables/</link>
					<comments>https://www.nyca.in/madras-high-court-strikes-down-excessive-gst-demand-on-trade-payables/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 04:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Excessive GST Demands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Legal System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Precedent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal System Evaluation.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madras High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Payables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade regulations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nyca.in/?p=8101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Madras High Court invalidated the order demanding payment concerning all trade payables, asserting that it exceeded the boundaries outlined in the original show cause notice.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/madras-high-court-strikes-down-excessive-gst-demand-on-trade-payables/">Madras High Court Strikes Down Excessive GST Demand on Trade Payables</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="8101" class="elementor elementor-8101">
						<section class="has_eae_slider elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-39d4c651 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default parallax_section_no qode_elementor_container_no" data-eae-slider="47372" data-id="39d4c651" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-66 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-2b96f44b" data-eae-slider="90082" data-id="2b96f44b" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-293f1b26 elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="293f1b26" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
															<img decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Madras-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Excessive-GST-Demand-On-Trade-Payables-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-8104" alt="" srcset="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Madras-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Excessive-GST-Demand-On-Trade-Payables-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Madras-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Excessive-GST-Demand-On-Trade-Payables-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Madras-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Excessive-GST-Demand-On-Trade-Payables-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Madras-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Excessive-GST-Demand-On-Trade-Payables-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Madras-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Excessive-GST-Demand-On-Trade-Payables-700x394.jpg 700w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Madras-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Excessive-GST-Demand-On-Trade-Payables-539x303.jpg 539w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Madras-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Excessive-GST-Demand-On-Trade-Payables.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />															</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-78fe7948 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="78fe7948" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="flex-1 overflow-hidden"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-79elbk h-full"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-1n7m0yu"><div class="flex flex-col pb-9 text-sm"><div class="w-full text-token-text-primary" data-testid="conversation-turn-11"><div class="px-4 py-2 justify-center text-base md:gap-6 m-auto"><div class="flex flex-1 text-base mx-auto gap-3 md:px-5 lg:px-1 xl:px-5 md:max-w-3xl lg:max-w-[40rem] xl:max-w-[48rem] group final-completion"><div class="relative flex w-full flex-col agent-turn"><div class="flex-col gap-1 md:gap-3"><div class="flex flex-grow flex-col max-w-full"><div class="min-h-[20px] text-message flex flex-col items-start gap-3 whitespace-pre-wrap break-words [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-5 overflow-x-auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="d2dc8340-8bc0-4c46-a48f-59179bbab82c"><div class="markdown prose w-full break-words dark:prose-invert light"><p><strong>Introduction:</strong></p><p>The Madras High Court invalidated the order demanding payment concerning all trade payables, asserting that it exceeded the boundaries outlined in the original show cause notice. This ruling is significant in the realm of audit cases and is poised to have widespread benefits.</p><p><strong>Facts of the case:</strong></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-efe99f0 elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="efe99f0" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The petitioner contested an order dated 31.12.2023, arguing its overreach beyond the purview of a preceding show cause notice by subjecting all trade payables to GST.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Following an audit report on 26.09.2023, the petitioner received a notice on 30.09.2023 proposing a tax of Rs. 43,66,708.14. However, the final order imposed a tax exceeding Rs. 90 crores, markedly surpassing the initial estimate.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Despite compliance with statutory Input Tax Credit (ITC) requirements, the petitioner faced penalties.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The crux of the matter lies in the imposition of GST on the entirety of the petitioner's trade payables, a move perceived by the petitioner as beyond the notice's scope and contrary to legal provisions.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-6ec163c4 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="6ec163c4" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Petitioner&#8217;s Argument:</strong></p><p>The petitioner contends that the order unjustly expanded the taxable amount well beyond the initial estimation, unfairly taxing trade payables as a taxable supply despite adhering to ITC regulations.</p><p><strong>Held:</strong></p><p>The Madras High Court deemed the imposition of GST on trade payables, as reflected in financial statements, prima facie unsustainable.</p><p>The court nullified the order, instructing the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed amount, excluding trade payables, and mandated a fresh review with adequate opportunity for the petitioner to present their case.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
				<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-33 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-aca71e3" data-eae-slider="59812" data-id="aca71e3" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-57c3130a elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="57c3130a" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="heading.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">category</h2>				</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-6bba1b64 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="6bba1b64" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><ul class='catlistsidebar'>	<li class="cat-item cat-item-14"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/company-law/">Corporate &amp; Allied Laws</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/income-tax/">Direct Tax</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-18"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/business-india/">Doing Business in India</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-13"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/gst/">GST</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-17"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/budget/">India Budget</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/news/">News</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-15"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/startup/">StartUp</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-16"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/subsidy-schemes/">Subsidy &amp; Schemes</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/monthly-updates/">The ReCap &#8211; Monthly News Letter</a>
</li>
</ul></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/madras-high-court-strikes-down-excessive-gst-demand-on-trade-payables/">Madras High Court Strikes Down Excessive GST Demand on Trade Payables</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.nyca.in/madras-high-court-strikes-down-excessive-gst-demand-on-trade-payables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
