CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases | https://www.nyca.in ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:57:03 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1 https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/9060CA_logo_icai-1.jpg CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases | https://www.nyca.in 32 32 Extended Period of Limitation: Understanding and Challenging Sec. 74 https://www.nyca.in/extended-period-of-limitation-understanding-and-challenging-sec-74/ https://www.nyca.in/extended-period-of-limitation-understanding-and-challenging-sec-74/#respond Sat, 20 Apr 2024 07:48:40 +0000 https://www.nyca.in/?p=8871 In the realm of taxation, navigating through various sections and provisions can be daunting.

The post Extended Period of Limitation: Understanding and Challenging Sec. 74 appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]>

In the realm of taxation, navigating through various sections and provisions can be daunting. One such area of concern for taxpayers is the extended period of limitation, particularly concerning the issuance of notices and the implications under Section 74. Understanding the nuances of this provision and the scope for challenging it is crucial for taxpayers and professionals alike.

1. Supreme Court Precedents

  • Krishnaraj Shipping Co. Ltd: The Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Krishnaraj Shipping Co. Ltd. sheds light on the invocability of the extended period of limitation. It emphasized that demanding service tax involving interpretational disputes does not warrant the invocation of the extended period.

2. CESTAT Chandigarh Insights

  • Antares Services Pvt. Ltd: CESTAT Chandigarh's stance, as seen in the case of Antares Services Pvt. Ltd., underscores the necessity of providing evidence of suppression, misstatement, fraud, or collusion for the proper invocation of the extended period of limitation.

3. Precedents from CESTAT Ahmedabad

  • Dinesh Chandra R Agarwal Infracon Pvt. Ltd: The case of Dinesh Chandra R Agarwal Infracon Pvt. Ltd. highlighted the importance of proof of intentional revenue suppression or misdeclaration for the validity of orders under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994.
  • Arya Logistics: In line with the above, Arya Logistics emphasized that in the absence of suppression of fact, a show cause notice issued after the prescribed limit of one year is not sustainable.

4. Insights from CESTAT Delhi

  • State Bank of Patiala: CESTAT Delhi, in the case of State Bank of Patiala, clarified that activities not constituting suppression cannot warrant the invocation of the extended period of limitation.

5. Precedents from CESTAT Allahabad

  • Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd: Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd. case highlighted that when the department is aware of facts from audits and regular filing of returns, invoking the extended limitation period based on alleged misclassification becomes untenable.

6. Perspectives from Delhi High Court

  • ITD-ITD CEM JV: Delhi High Court's stance, as seen in the case of ITD-ITD CEM JV, emphasized the necessity of recording reasons to believe in writing for assessment orders passed within the extended period.
  • H.M. Industries: H.M. Industries reiterated that the absence of assertions regarding concealment or failure to disclose full particulars negates the applicability of the extended period of limitation.

7. Insights from Mumbai CESTAT

  • Bajaj Health & Nutrition Pvt. Ltd.: The case of Bajaj Health & Nutrition Pvt. Ltd. highlighted that failure by customs cannot be attributed to the taxpayer, absolving them from charges of misdeclaration and evasion.

Understanding these precedents is pivotal for taxpayers and professionals aiming to navigate through the intricacies of tax laws effectively.

category

The post Extended Period of Limitation: Understanding and Challenging Sec. 74 appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]> https://www.nyca.in/extended-period-of-limitation-understanding-and-challenging-sec-74/feed/ 0 Extension of Appeal Filing Time by the Appellate Authority https://www.nyca.in/extension-of-appeal-filing-time-by-the-appellate-authority/ https://www.nyca.in/extension-of-appeal-filing-time-by-the-appellate-authority/#respond Fri, 12 Apr 2024 05:00:41 +0000 https://www.nyca.in/?p=8478 The authority of the Appellate Authority to extend the period for filing an appeal was deliberated upon in the case of Jyanata Ghosh v. State of West Bengal by the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court.

The post Extension of Appeal Filing Time by the Appellate Authority appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]>

Introduction:

The authority of the Appellate Authority to extend the period for filing an appeal was deliberated upon in the case of Jyanata Ghosh v. State of West Bengal by the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court.

Facts of the Case:

  • Mr. Jyanata Ghosh, referred to as the Petitioner, received a Show Cause Notice (SCN) which lacked essential details regarding personal hearing.
  • Following the SCN, an Order was issued on August 11, 2023, under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, demanding a significant sum from the Petitioner for a specified period.
  • The issuance of this order violated principles of natural justice as it did not grant the Petitioner an opportunity for personal hearing.
  • Challenging this order, the Petitioner appealed before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the CGST Act, only to have the appeal dismissed on the grounds of limitation.

Issue:

Whether the Appellate Authority possesses the jurisdiction to extend the period for filing an appeal.

Held:

  • The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court directed that the Appellate Authority should have granted the Petitioner a personal hearing and decided the appeal on its merits, emphasizing the violation of the principle of natural justice.
  • The court cited precedents such as Murtaza B Kaukawala v. State of West Bengal and S.K. Chakraborty & Sons v. Union of India, highlighting that delay can be condoned if the principles of natural justice are violated.
  • It was further noted that the prescribed period for filing an appeal, initially set at 30 days, can be extended by the Appellate Authority, as mandated by Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
  • Consequently, the court condoned the delay in filing the appeal and allowed the writ petition by setting aside the impugned order dated January 17, 2024. Additionally, it ordered a stay on the recovery proceedings pending the disposal of the appeal case, upon the Petitioner’s deposit of the pre-deposit amount, thereby disposing of the writ petition in favor of the Petitioner.

category

The post Extension of Appeal Filing Time by the Appellate Authority appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]> https://www.nyca.in/extension-of-appeal-filing-time-by-the-appellate-authority/feed/ 0 Discretion of Appellate Authority in Admitting Appeals Beyond Limitation Period https://www.nyca.in/discretion-of-appellate-authority-in-admitting-appeals-beyond-limitation-period/ https://www.nyca.in/discretion-of-appellate-authority-in-admitting-appeals-beyond-limitation-period/#respond Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:48:21 +0000 https://www.nyca.in/?p=7927 In the case of Arvind Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue State Taxes [Writ Petition Application No. 2904 of 2023 dated January 04, 2024]

The post Discretion of Appellate Authority in Admitting Appeals Beyond Limitation Period appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]>

In the case of Arvind Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue State Taxes [Writ Petition Application No. 2904 of 2023 dated January 04, 2024], the esteemed Calcutta High Court determined that the Appellate Authority possesses the discretion to permit the submission of an appeal within one month after the expiration of the prescribed limitation period from the date of order communication, provided sufficient cause is demonstrated, as per Section 107(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”).

Facts of the case:

  • The Appellate Authority retains discretion to accept appeals submitted after the limitation period.
  • The Calcutta High Court, in Arvind Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue State Taxes [Writ Petition Application No. 2904 of 2023 dated January 04, 2024], affirmed that the Appellate Authority possesses discretion to entertain appeals within one month after the expiration of the limitation period as per Section 107(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("CGST Act").
  • Arvind Gupta, the petitioner, appealed before the Senior Joint Commissioner of Revenue, mentioned in the annexure to FORM GST APL-01 the period of delay and reasons for the delay:
  • He was undergoing treatment for carcinoma maxilla at Apollo Hospital, Delhi, during July 2023 (prescription enclosed).
  • His health condition necessitated frequent visits to doctors in Delhi.
  • Despite these reasons, the Respondent rejected the appeal on October 30, 2023 ("Impugned Order"), citing lack of provision in the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("WBGST Act") to condone delays exceeding four months.

Issue:

Whether the Appellate Authority may exercise discretion to admit appeals submitted within one month after the limitation period?

Held:

  • The Calcutta High Court, in Writ Petition Application No. 2904 of 2023, ruled as follows:
  • Relied on, the Hon’ble Division Bench in the matter of S.K. Chakraborty v. Union of India & Ors. (MAT 82 of 2022) where the Bench held that the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 have not been expressly or impliedly excluded by Section 107 of the CGST Act under Section 29(2) of the CGST Act. Therefore, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 stands attracted. Hence, the Respondent has the discretion to allow an appeal to be presented within one month after the expiry of the period of limitation stipulated from the date of communication of the order upon sufficient cause being shown as per Section 107 (4) of the CGST Act. Paraphrase
  • Observed that, it was well within the power of the Respondent to consider the prayer of the Petitioner for condonation of delay. The Impugned Order passed by the Respondent that there is no scope to condone the delay beyond four months suffers from infirmity.
  • Noted that, the delay was evident from the annexure to FORM GST APL-01 and the Petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the statutory period.
  • Held that, the Respondent failed to exercise its jurisdiction. The delay in presenting the appeal before the Respondent was condoned. The Respondent was directed to consider the appeal on merit and decide the same in accordance with law upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner.

category

The post Discretion of Appellate Authority in Admitting Appeals Beyond Limitation Period appeared first on CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases.

]]> https://www.nyca.in/discretion-of-appellate-authority-in-admitting-appeals-beyond-limitation-period/feed/ 0