CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases |

Factors Driving the Surge in GST Collections

editor — Mon, 06 May 2024 04:37:56 +0000

As the monthly GST collections surged past `2 lakh crore in April, the discussion surrounding the factors propelling this growth intensifies. While conventional wisdom often attributes it solely to inflation, a closer examination reveals a more nuanced narrative. Let’s delve into the various factors contributing to the rise in GST collections, extending beyond the realm of inflationary trends.

Beyond Inflation: Understanding the Complex Dynamics

Contrary to popular belief, inflation alone cannot account for the significant surge in GST collections observed in recent years. An analysis by The New Indian Express, coupled with insights from economists, underscores the multifaceted nature of GST growth, highlighting the role of other critical factors.

The Impact of Compliance Enhancement

One of the primary drivers behind the surge in GST collections is the concerted effort to enhance tax compliance. Through the implementation of robust measures aimed at improving compliance, authorities have succeeded in significantly boosting revenue generation.

Tackling Tax Evasion: Plugging Loopholes

Another crucial factor contributing to the growth of GST collections is the rigorous crackdown on tax evasion loopholes. By implementing stringent measures to combat fraudulent activities and plug revenue leakages, authorities have successfully bolstered GST revenues.

Economic Activities and their Role in GST Growth

The correlation between economic activities and GST revenues cannot be overstated. As economic expansion accelerates, there is a corresponding increase in the consumption and production of goods and services, consequently leading to higher GST collections.

Statistical Insights

An in-depth analysis of GST growth trends reveals intriguing insights. While gross GST collections have witnessed a notable increase, adjusting for inflation provides a more nuanced perspective. This underscores the need to consider multiple factors when evaluating GST revenue dynamics.

Long-term Trends in GST Collections

A historical overview of GST collections sheds light on its evolution over the years. From its inception in 2017-18 to the present, GST revenues have witnessed remarkable growth, driven by a combination of economic factors and policy interventions.

Expert Perspectives

Leading economists offer valuable insights into the complex dynamics of GST growth. While inflation certainly plays a role, it is not the sole determinant of GST revenues. A holistic understanding requires taking into account compliance measures, tax evasion mitigation, and broader economic trends.

Source: https://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2024/May/03/not-only-inflation-many-factors-behind-rise-in-gst

category

Extended Period of Limitation: Understanding and Challenging Sec. 74

editor — Sat, 20 Apr 2024 07:48:40 +0000

In the realm of taxation, navigating through various sections and provisions can be daunting. One such area of concern for taxpayers is the extended period of limitation, particularly concerning the issuance of notices and the implications under Section 74. Understanding the nuances of this provision and the scope for challenging it is crucial for taxpayers and professionals alike.

1. Supreme Court Precedents

2. CESTAT Chandigarh Insights

3. Precedents from CESTAT Ahmedabad

Dinesh Chandra R Agarwal Infracon Pvt. Ltd: The case of Dinesh Chandra R Agarwal Infracon Pvt. Ltd. highlighted the importance of proof of intentional revenue suppression or misdeclaration for the validity of orders under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Arya Logistics: In line with the above, Arya Logistics emphasized that in the absence of suppression of fact, a show cause notice issued after the prescribed limit of one year is not sustainable.

4. Insights from CESTAT Delhi

5. Precedents from CESTAT Allahabad

6. Perspectives from Delhi High Court

ITD-ITD CEM JV: Delhi High Court's stance, as seen in the case of ITD-ITD CEM JV, emphasized the necessity of recording reasons to believe in writing for assessment orders passed within the extended period.
H.M. Industries: H.M. Industries reiterated that the absence of assertions regarding concealment or failure to disclose full particulars negates the applicability of the extended period of limitation.

7. Insights from Mumbai CESTAT

Understanding these precedents is pivotal for taxpayers and professionals aiming to navigate through the intricacies of tax laws effectively.

category

Taxpayers Get Choice in Valuing Startup Investments (Angel Tax)

editor — Mon, 15 Apr 2024 05:00:14 +0000

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of taxpayers, allowing them to select the method for valuing investments received from angel investors. This comes after a disagreement between a company (Agra Portfolio) and the Income Tax Department (IT Department) regarding the valuation of shares issued to an angel investor.

What is Angel Tax?

Angel tax refers to the tax levied on the difference between the fair market value (FMV) of shares allotted to an angel investor and the amount the investor paid for them.

The Case:

Agra Portfolio used the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method to determine the FMV of the shares. DCF estimates an investment’s value by considering its projected future cash flows. The IT Department, however, rejected this valuation and used the Net Asset Value (NAV) method instead. NAV calculates the value per share by dividing the company’s net assets (assets minus liabilities) by the total number of shares.

Court’s Decision:

The Court clarified that while the IT Department can question a taxpayer’s valuation report, it cannot impose a different valuation method. The Court emphasized that the Income Tax Act and Rules grant taxpayers the sole authority to choose the valuation method.

The IT Department can still scrutinize the report and conduct its own valuation (using the taxpayer’s chosen method) to challenge the taxpayer’s assessment.

Outcome:

The Court ordered the IT Department to re-evaluate Agra Portfolio’s case using the DCF method as chosen by the company.

This decision offers greater flexibility to startups and investors when determining the FMV of shares for angel investments.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/angel-tax-valuation-method-solely-assessees-choice-says-delhi-hc/article68043342.ece

category

Income Tax Department Cracks Down on Unfiled Returns: 1.52 Crore Individuals Targeted

editor — Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:21:28 +0000

Large Discrepancy Between Taxpayers and Filed Returns

The Income Tax Department is launching a campaign to target individuals who haven’t filed their income tax returns (ITR) despite meeting filing requirements. According to a report in the Economic Times, the department has identified 1.52 crore such individuals.

Data Discrepancies Trigger Action

This initiative stems from a data analysis by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which revealed a significant gap between the total number of taxpayers (8.9 crore in financial year 2022-23) and the number of ITRs filed (7.4 crore, including revised returns). This suggests that potentially 1.97 crore individuals might not have filed their returns even though tax was deducted at source (TDS) from their income.

Focus on High-Value Transactions

The I-T Department is particularly interested in individuals with high bank transactions linked to their PAN cards. Officials will be contacting these individuals to explain the importance of filing ITRs. Additionally, the CBDT has identified nearly 9,000 potential taxpayers who might have made high-value purchases or cash deposits and will be sending them tax notices.

Consequences for Non-Compliance

Individuals who deliberately neglected to file returns will face penalties. However, those with genuine reasons for the sudden increase in income can submit an explanation or file a return to rectify the situation.

Data Analytics Boosts Tax Collection

The Income Tax Department’s access to a vast amount of data has proven instrumental in identifying non-filers and uncovering inconsistencies. This focus on data analysis is credited with contributing to a significant rise (19.88%) in net direct tax collection, exceeding ₹18.90 lakh crore as of March 17th.

Source: https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/it-department-to-tap-1-52-crore-individuals-for-income-tax-return-filing-heres-why-101713003056572.html

category

State’s GST Department Witnesses 43% Decline in GSTIN Applications Following Introduction of Biometric Verification to Combat Fraudulent Billing

editor — Fri, 05 Apr 2024 04:41:47 +0000

A notable development within the state’s GST department reveals a substantial 43% decrease in the average monthly count of GSTIN (Goods and Services Tax Identification Number) applications since November 2023. This reduction, from 26,800 applications to 15,350 between November last year and February this year, is not indicative of a slowdown in business or establishment formations. Rather, it reflects a strategic initiative by the state government aimed at curbing fraudulent billing practices right from the registration stage.

A new protocol mandating biometric verification for GSTIN applicants has been initiated as part of a pilot program. This additional step effectively filters out illegitimate applications, thereby contributing to the observed decline in application numbers. Rolled out in November 2023, this initiative aims to bolster the security and efficacy of the registration process. Similar pilot projects are also underway in Andhra Pradesh and Puducherry.

According to a senior official from the SGST department, fraudulent billing often commences with the acquisition of counterfeit GST registration through deceptive means. These fictitious entities’ GSTINs are then exploited to generate sham invoices and claim input tax credits without any actual exchange of goods. Additionally, instances have surfaced where individuals have discovered the unauthorized use of their banking and identity credentials for these fake registrations.

Bogus billing has posed a significant challenge for Gujarat, particularly since the GST rollout. The state government has incurred losses amounting to Rs 11,443 crore due to tax evasion schemes involving fraudulent billing practices. The cumulative value involved in such operations is nearing Rs 1 lakh crore since the GST’s inception.

Under the revised verification framework, applicants must undergo thumbprint authentication and furnish various identification documents during GST registration to verify their identity. Moreover, applicants may undergo further scrutiny in the future if deemed necessary. The integration of biometric verification is anticipated to act as a deterrent against fraudulent activities by ensuring that GST registrations are exclusively issued to legitimate entities.

category

Delhi High Court Facilitates Refund Requests for Overpaid Taxes, Streamlining Procedural Deadlines for Taxpayers!

editor — Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:38:03 +0000

If the Tax Department has demanded payment for taxes from you because your supplier failed to remit them, and later it is discovered that your supplier did, indeed, pay the taxes, you should apply for a refund.

Facts of the Case & Timelines:

The petitioner was compelled to pay taxes on certain invoices for the fiscal year 2019-2020, due to the delayed filing of returns by Respondent No. 3.

Subsequently, it was revealed that Respondent No. 3 had filed returns and claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) for the same invoices, resulting in double payment. Consequently, the petitioner sought a refund for the excess payment.

Issue:

The main issue revolved around whether the petitioner is eligible for a refund of the tax paid under the assumption of non-compliance by Respondent No. 3, leading to double payment.

Petitioner’s Argument:

The petitioner contended that they were compelled to make the tax payment due to the initial non-compliance by Respondent No. 3. With the subsequent filing of returns, they asserted their right to a refund of the tax paid for the mentioned invoices.

Respondent’s Argument:

The respondent argued against the petitioner’s refund claim, stating that it was not entertained because the petitioner had not filed a proper refund application as required by Section 54 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017.

Held:

The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to submit an appropriate refund application in accordance with Section 54 of the Act. Furthermore, it decreed that the period from 01.03.2020 to 28.02.2023, as well as the period from the filing of the petition (19.01.2024) until the present date, should be excluded when calculating the limitation period for submitting a refund application.

The court refrained from discussing the merits of the case and reserved the right to adjudicate the refund claim according to the law.

category