<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases | </title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.nyca.in/tag/tax-dispute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.nyca.in</link>
	<description>ITR Filing 2023 &#124; Company Registration &#124; NGO Registration &#124; Income Tax Raid Cases &#124; Audit &#124; Inc Incroporation &#124; CPA in India &#124; Subsidy &#124;  Project Funding &#124; GST &#124; GST Raid Cases &#124; Income Tax Notice Faceless &#124; DRI Cases</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 05:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Writ Petition against Assessment Order not maintainable when remedy of appeal not availed during the period of limitation</title>
		<link>https://www.nyca.in/writ-petition-against-assessment-order-not-maintainable-when-remedy-of-appeal-not-availed-during-the-period-of-limitation/</link>
					<comments>https://www.nyca.in/writ-petition-against-assessment-order-not-maintainable-when-remedy-of-appeal-not-availed-during-the-period-of-limitation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 05:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appeal Remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Goods and Services Tax Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGST Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Writ Petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hon’ble High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impugned SCN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitation period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajasthan High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thekedar Nand Lal Sharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writ petition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nyca.in/?p=9686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Discover the latest verdict from Rajasthan High Court as the writ petition against an assessment order faces dismissal. Ensure timely appeal remedies for legal success.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/writ-petition-against-assessment-order-not-maintainable-when-remedy-of-appeal-not-availed-during-the-period-of-limitation/">Writ Petition against Assessment Order not maintainable when remedy of appeal not availed during the period of limitation</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="9686" class="elementor elementor-9686">
						<section class="has_eae_slider elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-54f65906 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default parallax_section_no qode_elementor_container_no" data-eae-slider="30814" data-id="54f65906" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-66 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-74363d91" data-eae-slider="7385" data-id="74363d91" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-3ef57f11 elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="3ef57f11" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
															<img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Writ-Petition-Against-Assessment-Order-Not-Maintainable-When-Remedy-Of-Appeal-Not-Availed-During-The-Period-Of-Limitation-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-9689" alt="" srcset="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Writ-Petition-Against-Assessment-Order-Not-Maintainable-When-Remedy-Of-Appeal-Not-Availed-During-The-Period-Of-Limitation-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Writ-Petition-Against-Assessment-Order-Not-Maintainable-When-Remedy-Of-Appeal-Not-Availed-During-The-Period-Of-Limitation-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Writ-Petition-Against-Assessment-Order-Not-Maintainable-When-Remedy-Of-Appeal-Not-Availed-During-The-Period-Of-Limitation-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Writ-Petition-Against-Assessment-Order-Not-Maintainable-When-Remedy-Of-Appeal-Not-Availed-During-The-Period-Of-Limitation-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Writ-Petition-Against-Assessment-Order-Not-Maintainable-When-Remedy-Of-Appeal-Not-Availed-During-The-Period-Of-Limitation-700x394.jpg 700w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Writ-Petition-Against-Assessment-Order-Not-Maintainable-When-Remedy-Of-Appeal-Not-Availed-During-The-Period-Of-Limitation-539x303.jpg 539w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Writ-Petition-Against-Assessment-Order-Not-Maintainable-When-Remedy-Of-Appeal-Not-Availed-During-The-Period-Of-Limitation.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />															</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-665e37f2 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="665e37f2" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p><p>In a recent case before the Hon&#8217;ble Rajasthan High Court, a significant ruling was delivered regarding the maintainability of writ petitions against Assessment Orders when the remedy of appeal has not been availed within the period of limitation. The case of M/s. Thekedar Nand Lal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. shed light on crucial aspects of tax law and judicial recourse.</p><p><strong>Facts of the Case</strong></p><p>M/s. Thekedar Nand Lal Sharma, herein referred to as &#8220;the Petitioner,&#8221; lodged a writ petition challenging the Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued by the Revenue Department on October 28, 2022, and the subsequent Order dated March 2, 2023, under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). Feeling aggrieved by these actions, the Petitioner sought recourse by filing a writ petition before the Hon&#8217;ble High Court.</p><p><strong>Issue</strong></p><p>The pivotal question before the court was whether a writ petition against an Assessment Order remains maintainable when the aggrieved party fails to avail the remedy of appeal within the stipulated period of limitation.</p><p><strong>Held</strong></p><p>In D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1437/2024, the Hon&#8217;ble Rajasthan High Court provided its ruling:</p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-47023bad elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="47023bad" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The court noted that the Petitioner refrained from filing an appeal and allowed the impugned Order to attain finality during the proceedings. Subsequently, the Petitioner approached the High Court by filing a writ petition against the tax, interest, and penalty imposed.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Furthermore, it was observed that the Petitioner consciously chose not to exercise the remedy of appeal as prescribed under Section 107 of the CGST Act. Instead, the Petitioner waited for the statutory period of limitation for filing an appeal to lapse.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Relying on a precedent set by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU, Kakinada &amp; Ors. vs. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited, the Rajasthan High Court concluded that a writ petition cannot be entertained to seek relief against an Assessment Order if the appeal remedy was not availed within the specified period. Therefore, the writ petition was deemed not maintainable.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
				<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-33 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-67b826d3" data-eae-slider="75522" data-id="67b826d3" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-6b659bc0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="6b659bc0" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="heading.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">category</h2>				</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-62f9be3f elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="62f9be3f" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><ul class='catlistsidebar'>	<li class="cat-item cat-item-14"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/company-law/">Corporate &amp; Allied Laws</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/income-tax/">Direct Tax</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-18"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/business-india/">Doing Business in India</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-13"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/gst/">GST</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-17"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/budget/">India Budget</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/news/">News</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-15"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/startup/">StartUp</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-16"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/subsidy-schemes/">Subsidy &amp; Schemes</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/monthly-updates/">The ReCap &#8211; Monthly News Letter</a>
</li>
</ul></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/writ-petition-against-assessment-order-not-maintainable-when-remedy-of-appeal-not-availed-during-the-period-of-limitation/">Writ Petition against Assessment Order not maintainable when remedy of appeal not availed during the period of limitation</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.nyca.in/writ-petition-against-assessment-order-not-maintainable-when-remedy-of-appeal-not-availed-during-the-period-of-limitation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocking Verdict: Madras HC Challenges Tax Authority!</title>
		<link>https://www.nyca.in/shocking-verdict-madras-hc-challenges-tax-authority/</link>
					<comments>https://www.nyca.in/shocking-verdict-madras-hc-challenges-tax-authority/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Precedent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madras High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shocking verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nyca.in/?p=8709</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent ruling that has significant implications for taxpayers and tax authorities alike, the Madras High Court delivered a landmark judgment concerning Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/shocking-verdict-madras-hc-challenges-tax-authority/">Shocking Verdict: Madras HC Challenges Tax Authority!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="8709" class="elementor elementor-8709">
						<section class="has_eae_slider elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-6bbf7079 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default parallax_section_no qode_elementor_container_no" data-eae-slider="39542" data-id="6bbf7079" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-66 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-2a6b85f6" data-eae-slider="76027" data-id="2a6b85f6" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-2d138a7d elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="2d138a7d" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
															<img decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Shocking-Verdict-Madras-HC-Challenges-Tax-Authority-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-8712" alt="" srcset="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Shocking-Verdict-Madras-HC-Challenges-Tax-Authority-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Shocking-Verdict-Madras-HC-Challenges-Tax-Authority-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Shocking-Verdict-Madras-HC-Challenges-Tax-Authority-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Shocking-Verdict-Madras-HC-Challenges-Tax-Authority-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Shocking-Verdict-Madras-HC-Challenges-Tax-Authority-700x394.jpg 700w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Shocking-Verdict-Madras-HC-Challenges-Tax-Authority-539x303.jpg 539w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Shocking-Verdict-Madras-HC-Challenges-Tax-Authority.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />															</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-584cee9b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="584cee9b" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="flex-1 overflow-hidden"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-79elbk h-full"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-1n7m0yu"><div class="flex flex-col pb-9 text-sm"><div class="w-full text-token-text-primary" data-testid="conversation-turn-11"><div class="px-4 py-2 justify-center text-base md:gap-6 m-auto"><div class="flex flex-1 text-base mx-auto gap-3 md:px-5 lg:px-1 xl:px-5 md:max-w-3xl lg:max-w-[40rem] xl:max-w-[48rem] group final-completion"><div class="relative flex w-full flex-col agent-turn"><div class="flex-col gap-1 md:gap-3"><div class="flex flex-grow flex-col max-w-full"><div class="min-h-[20px] text-message flex flex-col items-start gap-3 whitespace-pre-wrap break-words [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-5 overflow-x-auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="d2dc8340-8bc0-4c46-a48f-59179bbab82c"><div class="markdown prose w-full break-words dark:prose-invert light"><p>In a recent ruling that has significant implications for taxpayers and tax authorities alike, the Madras High Court delivered a landmark judgment concerning Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims. This judgment addresses the issue of rejecting ITC claims solely due to their absence in GSTR-3B filings, emphasizing the need for a thorough review of related documents such as GSTR-2A and GSTR-9 for a comprehensive assessment. Let&#8217;s delve into the details of this case and its implications.</p><p><strong>Facts of the Case</strong></p><p>The case involved Sri Shanmuga Hardwares Electricals challenging assessment orders spanning from 2017 to 2020. The crux of the matter revolved around the company&#8217;s ITC claims based on GSTR-2A data, despite filing &#8220;NIL&#8221; returns in GSTR-3B. These claims were rejected by the State Tax Officer, prompting a legal challenge.</p><p><strong>Issue</strong></p><p>The central issue at hand was whether Sri Shanmuga Hardwares Electricals was entitled to claim ITC that was not reported in the GSTR-3B returns but was reflected in the GSTR-2A and subsequently in the GSTR-9 annual returns.</p><p><strong>Held</strong></p><p>In its ruling, the Madras High Court quashed the assessment orders and remanded the case for reconsideration. The court emphasized that rejecting ITC claims solely on the basis of their absence in GSTR-3B filings was unjustified. Instead, it instructed the assessing officer to conduct a thorough examination of all relevant documents to assess the validity of the ITC claim. The petitioner was directed to submit all pertinent documents, and the assessing officer was instructed to issue fresh assessment orders after providing a reasonable opportunity for a personal hearing.</p><p>This judgment, delivered in the case of Sri Shanmuga Hardwares Electricals vs. The State Tax Officer, highlights the importance of substantiating ITC claims with comprehensive documentation. It underscores the necessity for tax authorities to consider all relevant returns and documents before making decisions on ITC claims.</p><p>This ruling could potentially lead to a more nuanced understanding and handling of ITC claims, benefiting taxpayers who may have encountered similar issues in their filings.</p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
				<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-33 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-785c36c" data-eae-slider="49567" data-id="785c36c" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-135d506f elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="135d506f" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="heading.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">category</h2>				</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-748c8be elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="748c8be" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><ul class='catlistsidebar'>	<li class="cat-item cat-item-14"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/company-law/">Corporate &amp; Allied Laws</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/income-tax/">Direct Tax</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-18"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/business-india/">Doing Business in India</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-13"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/gst/">GST</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-17"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/budget/">India Budget</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/news/">News</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-15"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/startup/">StartUp</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-16"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/subsidy-schemes/">Subsidy &amp; Schemes</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/monthly-updates/">The ReCap &#8211; Monthly News Letter</a>
</li>
</ul></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/shocking-verdict-madras-hc-challenges-tax-authority/">Shocking Verdict: Madras HC Challenges Tax Authority!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.nyca.in/shocking-verdict-madras-hc-challenges-tax-authority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi High Court Orders Refund of ₹35 Lakh to GST Petitioner, Emphasizing Voluntary Compliance and Due Process</title>
		<link>https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/</link>
					<comments>https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST petitioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Legal System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal perspective.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Precedent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal victory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refund ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax refund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voluntary compliance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nyca.in/?p=8511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Delhi High Court's decision mandates a refund of ₹35 lakh to a GST petitioner, underscoring the significance of voluntary compliance and adherence to due process.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/">Delhi High Court Orders Refund of ₹35 Lakh to GST Petitioner, Emphasizing Voluntary Compliance and Due Process</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="8511" class="elementor elementor-8511">
						<section class="has_eae_slider elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-54c83f11 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default parallax_section_no qode_elementor_container_no" data-eae-slider="57339" data-id="54c83f11" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-66 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-25dd7777" data-eae-slider="94952" data-id="25dd7777" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-36c22c2e elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="36c22c2e" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
															<img decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-8514" alt="" srcset="https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-700x394.jpg 700w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process-539x303.jpg 539w, https://www.nyca.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Delhi-High-Court-Orders-Refund-Of-₹35-Lakh-To-GST-Petitioner-Emphasizing-Voluntary-Compliance-And-Due-Process.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />															</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-32c74c87 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="32c74c87" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="flex-1 overflow-hidden"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-79elbk h-full"><div class="react-scroll-to-bottom--css-ltbkw-1n7m0yu"><div class="flex flex-col pb-9 text-sm"><div class="w-full text-token-text-primary" data-testid="conversation-turn-11"><div class="px-4 py-2 justify-center text-base md:gap-6 m-auto"><div class="flex flex-1 text-base mx-auto gap-3 md:px-5 lg:px-1 xl:px-5 md:max-w-3xl lg:max-w-[40rem] xl:max-w-[48rem] group final-completion"><div class="relative flex w-full flex-col agent-turn"><div class="flex-col gap-1 md:gap-3"><div class="flex flex-grow flex-col max-w-full"><div class="min-h-[20px] text-message flex flex-col items-start gap-3 whitespace-pre-wrap break-words [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-5 overflow-x-auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="d2dc8340-8bc0-4c46-a48f-59179bbab82c"><div class="markdown prose w-full break-words dark:prose-invert light"><p><strong>Introduction:</strong></p><p>The Delhi High Court&#8217;s decision mandates a refund of ₹35 lakh to a GST petitioner, underscoring the significance of voluntary compliance and adherence to due process.</p><p><strong>Facts of the Case:</strong></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-35631f0a elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="35631f0a" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">On January 6, 2023, the petitioner underwent a search operation based on allegations of suppressed transactions, excessive input tax credit claims, and GST evasion.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The search, conducted on January 7, 2023, compelled the petitioner to reverse an Input Tax Credit of ₹35,00,000 using FORM GST DRC-03.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-7dcbeedd elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="7dcbeedd" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Issue:</strong></p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-6887892f elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="6887892f" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">The central issue pertained to whether the amount recovered during the search operation was voluntarily deposited or coerced, necessitating a refund.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-221a6cf4 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="221a6cf4" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Held:</strong></p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-1f424a39 elementor-icon-list--layout-traditional elementor-list-item-link-full_width elementor-widget elementor-widget-icon-list" data-id="1f424a39" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="icon-list.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<ul class="elementor-icon-list-items">
							<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Petitioner's Argument: Citing precedent cases, the petitioner argued that the deposit was made involuntarily under coercion, warranting a refund with interest.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Respondent's Argument: The respondent contended that the deposit was voluntary and proceeded with recovery under Section 73 of the GST Act through a Show Cause Notice.</span>
									</li>
								<li class="elementor-icon-list-item">
											<span class="elementor-icon-list-icon">
							<i aria-hidden="true" class="fas fa-circle"></i>						</span>
										<span class="elementor-icon-list-text">Court Judgment: The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the refund of ₹35,00,000 with 6% interest per annum from the date of deposit. The court deemed the deposit as non-voluntary and contrary to guidelines issued by the CBIC.</span>
									</li>
						</ul>
						</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
				<div class="has_eae_slider elementor-column elementor-col-33 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-404576d0" data-eae-slider="6227" data-id="404576d0" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-4c5fd799 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="4c5fd799" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="heading.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">category</h2>				</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-2fe25511 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="2fe25511" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><ul class='catlistsidebar'>	<li class="cat-item cat-item-14"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/company-law/">Corporate &amp; Allied Laws</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/income-tax/">Direct Tax</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-18"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/business-india/">Doing Business in India</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-13"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/gst/">GST</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-17"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/budget/">India Budget</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/news/">News</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-15"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/startup/">StartUp</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-16"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/subsidy-schemes/">Subsidy &amp; Schemes</a>
</li>
	<li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://www.nyca.in/category/monthly-updates/">The ReCap &#8211; Monthly News Letter</a>
</li>
</ul></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/">Delhi High Court Orders Refund of ₹35 Lakh to GST Petitioner, Emphasizing Voluntary Compliance and Due Process</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nyca.in">CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.nyca.in/delhi-high-court-orders-refund-of-%e2%82%b935-lakh-to-gst-petitioner-emphasizing-voluntary-compliance-and-due-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
