CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases |

Identifying Instances Leading to Income Tax Notices in Real Estate Deals and Credit Card Transactions

editor — Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:21:14 +0000

Tracking Financial Activities:

The Income Tax Department meticulously monitors all financial transactions carried out by individuals, utilizing various data sources to ensure adherence to tax regulations. Certain transactions may trigger heightened scrutiny from tax authorities.

High-Value Cash Transactions:

The tax department pays particular attention to high-value cash transactions. For instance, if an individual receives a cash deposit exceeding Rs 10 lakh in a savings account within a fiscal year, this could prompt the department to issue a notice seeking clarification regarding the source of funds.

Mandatory Reporting by Banks:

As per the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) directives, banks are mandated to report instances where an individual deposits Rs 10 lakh or more across one or more time deposit accounts during a financial year, excluding deposits made through the renewal of another time deposit. Additionally, all banks, including cooperative banks, must report cash deposits of Rs 10 lakh or more across one or multiple accounts of an individual, excluding current accounts and time deposits.

Scrutiny of Securities Transactions:

Financial institutions and companies issuing bonds or debentures are obligated to report receiving Rs 10 lakh or more from any individual in a financial year for acquiring such securities. This measure is aimed at detecting potential instances of tax evasion or undisclosed income associated with significant cash movements.

Credit Card Transactions:

Several instances of credit card transactions may trigger Income Tax notices:

Cash deposits exceeding Rs 10 lakh for savings accounts and Rs 50 lakh for current accounts, along with substantial withdrawals, may prompt inquiries into the origin and intended use of the funds.
Real estate transactions exceeding Rs 30 lakh may come under the scrutiny of the tax department, which seeks detailed information about the transaction and involved parties.
Investments surpassing Rs 10 lakh in stocks, mutual funds, or bonds may attract scrutiny if the origin of funds appears inconsistent with reported income.
Although the Income Tax department does not actively monitor individual credit card transactions, cash payments exceeding Rs 1 lakh towards credit cards or substantial debt settlements exceeding Rs 10 lakh made in cash may undergo scrutiny and investigation. Ensuring transparency in significant transactions with verifiable fund sources is imperative, as unaccounted cash inflows may trigger investigations.

Mismatch of Declared Income:

Discrepancies between declared income and bank data may prompt notifications from the tax department, highlighting the importance of maintaining accurate financial records.

Foreign Exchange Transactions:

Any purchase of foreign exchange totaling Rs 10 lakh, including travelers’ checks, forex cards, or debit/credit card transactions, must be reported to ensure compliance with tax regulations.

Source: https://www.businesstoday.in/personal-finance/tax/story/real-estate-deals-credit-card-transactions-6-times-one-can-get-income-tax-notice-425280-2024-04-12

category

E-Invoicing Under GST

editor — Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:41:19 +0000

E-invoicing within the GST framework refers to the electronic authentication of invoices as outlined by GST regulations. It’s akin to how GST-registered businesses utilize e-way bills for transporting goods. Likewise, specific GST-registered entities are required to produce e-invoices for their Business-to-Business (B2B) transactions.

What is e-invoicing under GST?

E-invoicing, or electronic invoicing, refers to a system where B2B invoices and certain other documents are electronically authenticated by GSTN for further use on the common GST portal.
The GST Council decided to implement e-invoicing in its 35th meeting, initially covering specific categories of mostly large enterprises, which later expanded to include mid-sized and small businesses.

Who must generate e-invoice and its Applicability?

E-invoicing applies based on turnover criteria or e-invoice limits set by phases.
Taxpayers exceeding specified turnover limits in any financial year from 2017-18 to 2021-22 must comply with e-invoicing from FY 2022-23 onwards.
Certain notified businesses are exempt from e-invoicing, such as insurers, banking companies, and others as listed by CBIC notifications.

Transactions and documents criteria

Systems before & after e-invoicing

Time limit to generate e-Invoice

Process of getting an e-invoice

Benefits of e-Invoicing to businesses

How can e-invoicing curb tax evasion?

What are the mandatory fields of an e-invoice?

category

GST Evasion and the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI)

editor — Fri, 12 Apr 2024 05:40:03 +0000

Instances of the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) investigating tax evasion are frequently encountered. Many may wonder about the role and operations of this organization. Here, we delve into key questions surrounding DGGI and its functioning.

What is DGGI?

DGGI, formerly known as the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI), is primarily tasked with combating GST evasion. As the apex intelligence body under the CBIC, it collects intelligence related to GST evasion.

Role of DGGI:

DGGI’s mandate includes gathering, analyzing, and disseminating intelligence on GST, Central Excise (CE), and Service Tax (ST) evasion. It also investigates offenses involving such evasion, suggests policy changes, and collaborates with other law enforcement agencies.

Presence of DGGI:

Headquartered in New Delhi, DGGI operates through regional and zonal units across the country, comprising a relatively lean workforce of approximately 1500 personnel.

Operation of DGGI:

The intelligence-gathering process involves sophisticated data analysis, monitoring sectoral performance, scrutinizing company submissions, and collaborating with state GST enforcement bodies. Additionally, information from informers, including disgruntled employees, is integral to its operations.

Informers and Rewards:

DGGI maintains a robust reward scheme to incentivize informers, offering rewards of up to 20% of recovered amounts. Similarly, officers involved in case detection and resolution are eligible for rewards.

Assessment of Information:

Collected intelligence undergoes rigorous examination to confirm its validity and actionable nature. Subsequently, investigations may commence through summons or, if deemed necessary, through inspection, search, and seizure under relevant provisions.

Powers and Functions:

DGGI exercises powers of inspection, search, and seizure under the CGST Act, subject to legal safeguards and due process. Reasonable belief is crucial in initiating such actions, and adherence to legal procedures is paramount.

Outcome of Raids:

Following raids or search operations, individuals are summoned to provide explanations. Where evidence suggests offenses, arrests can be made, subject to legal provisions and procedures.

Show Cause Notices:

After collecting evidence, evasion charges are formalized through Show Cause Notices (SCNs), allowing parties opportunities to defend themselves and appeal.

Awareness and Compliance:

Taxpayers and companies are advised to adhere strictly to legal requirements, as evasion detection mechanisms are advanced. Compliance, engagement with authorities, and staying abreast of legal developments are recommended.

New SOP for DGGI:

A recent SOP issued by CBIC suggests a need for balanced enforcement practices, avoiding overreach. Close engagement with industry and adherence to legal interpretations are emphasized.

Source: CNBC-TV18 (https://www.cnbctv18.com/business/explained-heres-what-you-should-know-about-gst-evasion-and-dggi-19394551.html)

category

High Court Advocates Direct Communication, Urges Tax Department to Inform Taxpayers Prior to Action

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:01:01 +0000

Introduction:

Certain demographics, including senior citizens, technologically hesitant individuals, Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), and those prone to forgetfulness, might be unaware of the Income Tax Department’s actions against them. The department initiates proceedings by uploading show-cause notices or summons to its online portal, without directly notifying these taxpayers via email or letter. Consequently, individuals who infrequently check the tax portal, as is common, may face unforeseen penalties and complications. This operational method by the tax authorities has raised concerns about its fairness.

High Court’s Critique:

Recently, the High Court criticized the tax authorities’ approach, highlighting the unreasonableness of expecting taxpayers to constantly monitor the e-portal for updates. In a case concerning the Munjal BCU Centre of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, the Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed a show-cause notice from November 2022. The court emphasized that legal provisions dictate the manner in which notices and orders must be served, rejecting the notion of notices being “presumed” received solely by placement on the e-portal.

Importance of Natural Justice:

An expert underscored the significance of natural justice in legal proceedings, emphasizing the principle of “audi alteram partem,” which requires both parties to be heard. Lack of communication regarding assessments, penalties, or other actions could result in hardships for taxpayers, missed deadlines, and ignorance of their right to respond, thereby increasing burdens for all parties involved.

Case Example: Munjal BCU:

Munjal BCU, dedicated to fostering innovation and startups in Ludhiana, received initial notices and reminders solely through the online tax portal. The court deemed this insufficient opportunity for the organization to present its case.

Historical Context:

Before 2009, the tax department primarily relied on physical mail for communication, transitioning to electronic means later. Placing communications solely on the income tax portal can pose tracking challenges, especially for certain demographics uncomfortable with technology. While portal accessibility is convenient, supplementary notifications via email and/or physical mail are necessary.

Expected Changes:

The court’s decision is expected to prompt the department to communicate through emails for various matters, including notices and summons.

Practitioners’ Concerns:

Tax practitioners have noted issues with recent proceedings, including notices not being visible on the portal and unreasonable response timeframes.

category

Approval of outstanding refunds must be completed by April 30, Income Tax Department.

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 04:45:35 +0000

The Income Tax Department has announced a positive development for individuals awaiting their income tax refunds. They have set a firm deadline of April 30 for the approval of all pending refunds.

Since the opening of the portal for the Assessment Year 2024-25 on April 1, there has been considerable activity, with over 46,000 income tax returns filed within the initial five days. Out of these, close to 3,000 returns have already undergone processing.

The Department has devised an interim action plan for the current fiscal year, outlining specific timelines for addressing various taxpayer-related matters. Immediate attention has been directed towards the approval of pending refunds, particularly those withheld under section 241A due to potential adverse effects on revenue, following the completion of scrutiny assessments and necessary orders. Despite the issuance of refunds exceeding ₹3.36 lakh crore in the fiscal year 2023-24, complaints persist regarding pending refunds from previous fiscal years.

Officials emphasize the importance of approving all pending refunds related to e-returns filed on the Income Tax Business Application (ITBA) for all assessment years by April 30. Additionally, a deadline of June 30 has been set for resolving penalties in at least half of the cases that will become time-barred by March 31, 2025.

Furthermore, attention has been drawn to cases involving Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), with a one-month timeframe provided for disposing of all pending applications as of April 1, 2024, for NIL or lower TDS/TCS. Additionally, orders are expected to be issued by June 30 for cases where TDS surveys were conducted up to March 31, 2024.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/it-department-sets-april-30-as-deadline-for-approval-of-pending-refunds/article68042765.ece

category

Merely uploading SCN under the category “Additional Notices” instead of “Notices” on the GST portal does not constitute sufficient intimation to the taxpayer

editor — Tue, 09 Apr 2024 05:43:22 +0000

Introduction:

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court, in the case of Anhad Impex v. Assistant Commissioner, addressed the issue of whether the misplacement of a Show Cause Notice (SCN) in the “Additional Notices” category instead of “Notices” on the GST portal constitutes sufficient intimation to the taxpayer. This analysis examines the court’s findings and the implications for similar cases.

Facts of the Case:

Introduction:

Facts of the Case:

M/s. Anhad Impex ("the Petitioner") received an Impugned Order dated November 29, 2023, from the Assistant Commissioner ("the Respondent"), creating a demand under Section 73 of the CGST Act.
The Petitioner asserted that they never received the SCN, which formed the basis of the Impugned Order, thus depriving them of the opportunity to respond or participate in adjudication proceedings.
SCNs are typically uploaded under the "Notices" section on the GST portal, but in this instance, it was placed in the less accessible "Additional Notices" category, leading the Petitioner to miss it.
The Respondent contended that uploading the notice on the GST portal suffices as per Section 169 of the CGST Act.

Issue:

Whether the misplacement of the SCN in “Additional Notices” rather than “Notices” warrants the invalidation of the demand order?

Held:

The court noted that the Petitioner's lack of response to the SCN indicated a lack of proper and timely intimation.
Placing the SCN under "Additional Notices" instead of "Notices" made it less accessible, infringing upon principles of natural justice and provisions of the CGST Act.
Referring to precedents such as East Coast Constructions & Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner and Murugesan Jayalakshmi v. State Tax Officer, the court emphasized the importance of proper categorization on the portal.
Consequently, the Impugned Order was set aside, with directions for the Petitioner to respond to the SCN, and the Respondent to re-adjudicate the matter with a personal hearing within four weeks.

category

Income Tax Department enabled the Form 10IE for AY 2024-25 for filing on the income tax e-filing portal

editor — Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:56:22 +0000

The Income Tax Department has enabled Form 10IE for AY 2024-25 for filing on the income tax e-filing portal.

Please note: This Form 10IE is applicable to those who opt for the old Tax regime for A.Y .2024-25 as the new Tax regime is the default Tax regime.

Source #Income Tax Portal

category

Entitlement to Interest Commences After Sixty Days from Refund Application Until Credited to Bank Account

editor — Sat, 06 Apr 2024 05:35:52 +0000

In a significant ruling by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, Raghav Ventures vs. Commissioner of Delhi [W.P.(C) NO. 12209 OF 2023 dated March 01, 2024], the issue of entitlement to interest on delayed GST refunds was examined. The case sheds light on the statutory provisions and clarifications regarding the payment of interest under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (“the CGST Act”).

Facts of the Case:

M/s Raghav Ventures ("the Petitioner") engaged in exporting mobile phones and accessories to M/s AZ Logistic, Dubai, UAE, thereby paying Integrated Goods and Services Tax ("IGST").
During the Impugned Period (December 2022, February 2023, March 2023, and May 2023), the Petitioner paid IGST totaling significant amounts i.e. Rs. 1,63,16,851/-, Rs. 50,46,889/-, Rs. 17,26,288/-, and Rs. 13,85,382/-, respectively.
The Petitioner filed refund applications for the IGST paid during the Impugned Periods in accordance with the prescribed procedure under the CGST rules.
Despite receiving acknowledgments for the refund applications, the refunds were not processed within the stipulated time frame.
The IGST refunds were eventually sanctioned and credited into the Petitioner's bank account but without any accompanying interest.
The Petitioner subsequently filed an application to the Revenue Department seeking interest on the delayed refunds.

Issue:

Whether the Petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed refund of IGST as per statutory provisions?

Held:

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court, in the Writ Petition (C) NO. 12209 OF 2023, held the following:

Interest becomes payable under Section 56 of the CGST Act if the refund ordered under Section 54(5) is not processed within 60 days from the date of the refund application.
The payment of interest under Section 56 is a statutory provision and does not rely on any claim made by the assessee.
Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated November 18, 2019, clarifies that interest accrues from the date immediately after the expiry of sixty days from the date of the refund application until the amount is credited to the applicant's bank account.
Consequently, the Petitioner is entitled to statutory interest at the rate of 6% from the date following the expiry of sixty days from the date of the refund application until the refund is credited to the bank account.
The Court directed the Revenue Department to process the refund of interest and credit the same into the Petitioner's account within four weeks.

category

Audit wing of SGST Authority shall keep all proceedings in abeyance if the subject matter is pending before the CGST Authority

editor — Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:57:29 +0000

The Audit division of the State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) Authority is mandated to suspend all actions if a matter is pending before the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Authority, according to a ruling by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Mahabir Prasad Kedia v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax [MAT No. 2388 of 2023 dated January 9, 2024].

Facts:

Mr. Mahabir Prasad Kedia, the Appellant, received an audit memo highlighting several discrepancies.
Upon receiving the audit notice, the Appellant informed the SGST Authority about a show cause notice (SCN) issued by the anti-evasion wing of the CGST Department on March 28, 2023, addressing the same issues for the financial years 2017-2018 to 2021-2022.
The Appellant responded to the Impugned SCN on May 04, 2023, and the matter was pending adjudication.
Despite the Appellant's submission, the audit wing of the SGST Authority overlooked it and proceeded with the matter.
The subject was pending adjudication by the CGST Authority, to whom the Appellant had submitted a reply on May 02, 2023.

Held:

The Calcutta High Court ruled that the SGST Authority's audit division should suspend proceedings concerning the discrepancy noted, as the matter was under consideration by the CGST Authority.
Following this decision, the SGST Authority issued an SCN on December 29, 2023, clarifying that the audit wing should not proceed with the matter.
Consequently, the appeal, along with related applications and writ petitions, was disposed of.
The SGST Authority was directed to halt all proceedings regarding the noted discrepancy, including the show cause notice issued on December 29, 2023, and adhere to the adjudication order from the CGST Authority regarding the Impugned SCN.

category

Investigation of Large Corporations and Multinational Companies under GST Requires ‘Formal Authorization’

editor — Tue, 02 Apr 2024 07:46:09 +0000

The Department of Revenue has issued directives to CGST officials regarding the initiation of investigations into cases involving prominent industrial entities and multinational corporations (MNCs). These guidelines aim to streamline procedures and ensure uniformity in enforcement activities while maintaining the ease of doing business.

These guidelines outline specific scenarios where written approval from the zonal Chief Commissioner is necessary before initiating an investigation or taking action. These include cases involving large corporates, major MNCs, matters already under consideration by the GST Council, or matters seeking to impose taxes or duties on a sector, commodity, or service for the first time under Central excise or GST.

The precise definition of ‘big industrial house’ and major MNCs under these guidelines remains unclear to tax experts. Additionally, the guidelines require CGST field formations to gather details on prevailing trade practices and transaction nature from stakeholders in such cases, ensuring sufficient justification for initiating investigations and actions.

This uniform procedure was introduced following discussions by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) on the necessity for standardized enforcement procedures by CGST field formations, particularly concerning regular taxpayers and their impact on the ease of doing business.

Furthermore, tax officials are instructed to confirm whether any ongoing inquiries relate to the same subject matter or taxpayer by another investigating office or tax administration. This information must be presented to the authority responsible for approving the investigation’s initiation.

Experts believe that the directive addresses industry concerns, emphasizing the importance of effective implementation to promote tax certainty and stability in the business environment.

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/now-gst-probe-into-big-corporates-major-mncs-needs-a-written-approval/article68013343.ece

category