CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases |

Tax Season Update: Over 7 Lakh Returns Filed So Far for Assessment Year 24-25

editor — Tue, 07 May 2024 05:01:39 +0000

As taxpayers gear up for the tax filing season for the assessment year 24-25, recent data from official sources sheds light on the progress made in filing returns. The figures reveal that a substantial number of returns have already been processed, indicating a proactive approach from taxpayers in meeting their tax obligations. Let’s delve into the details of this tax season update and explore the steps involved in filing Income Tax Returns (ITRs) online.

The significant number of verified returns underscores the active participation of taxpayers in adhering to tax regulations. Tax authorities attribute this positive trend to the concerted efforts of both taxpayers and regulatory bodies in ensuring timely compliance and accurate filing.

Filing ITRs has been made more convenient with the introduction of online platforms. The Income Tax Department’s e-filing portal offers a seamless experience, enabling taxpayers to file their returns from the comfort of their homes or offices.

Logging In

Accessing ‘File Income Tax Return’

Selection of Assessment Year

Indicating Filing Status

Choosing the ITR Type

Reason for Filing ITR

Validation of Pre-filled Information

E-verification of ITR

‘Pay Later’ Option

The Income Tax e-filing portal now offers a ‘Pay Later’ option, allowing taxpayers to complete the filing process before making tax payments.

Source: https://www.republicworld.com/business/personal-finance/over-7-lakh-returns-filed-in-tax-season-for-assessment-year-24-25/?amp=1

category

Taxpayers Get Choice in Valuing Startup Investments (Angel Tax)

editor — Mon, 15 Apr 2024 05:00:14 +0000

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of taxpayers, allowing them to select the method for valuing investments received from angel investors. This comes after a disagreement between a company (Agra Portfolio) and the Income Tax Department (IT Department) regarding the valuation of shares issued to an angel investor.

What is Angel Tax?

Angel tax refers to the tax levied on the difference between the fair market value (FMV) of shares allotted to an angel investor and the amount the investor paid for them.

The Case:

Agra Portfolio used the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method to determine the FMV of the shares. DCF estimates an investment’s value by considering its projected future cash flows. The IT Department, however, rejected this valuation and used the Net Asset Value (NAV) method instead. NAV calculates the value per share by dividing the company’s net assets (assets minus liabilities) by the total number of shares.

Court’s Decision:

The Court clarified that while the IT Department can question a taxpayer’s valuation report, it cannot impose a different valuation method. The Court emphasized that the Income Tax Act and Rules grant taxpayers the sole authority to choose the valuation method.

The IT Department can still scrutinize the report and conduct its own valuation (using the taxpayer’s chosen method) to challenge the taxpayer’s assessment.

Outcome:

The Court ordered the IT Department to re-evaluate Agra Portfolio’s case using the DCF method as chosen by the company.

This decision offers greater flexibility to startups and investors when determining the FMV of shares for angel investments.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/angel-tax-valuation-method-solely-assessees-choice-says-delhi-hc/article68043342.ece

category

Identifying Instances Leading to Income Tax Notices in Real Estate Deals and Credit Card Transactions

editor — Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:21:14 +0000

Tracking Financial Activities:

The Income Tax Department meticulously monitors all financial transactions carried out by individuals, utilizing various data sources to ensure adherence to tax regulations. Certain transactions may trigger heightened scrutiny from tax authorities.

High-Value Cash Transactions:

The tax department pays particular attention to high-value cash transactions. For instance, if an individual receives a cash deposit exceeding Rs 10 lakh in a savings account within a fiscal year, this could prompt the department to issue a notice seeking clarification regarding the source of funds.

Mandatory Reporting by Banks:

As per the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) directives, banks are mandated to report instances where an individual deposits Rs 10 lakh or more across one or more time deposit accounts during a financial year, excluding deposits made through the renewal of another time deposit. Additionally, all banks, including cooperative banks, must report cash deposits of Rs 10 lakh or more across one or multiple accounts of an individual, excluding current accounts and time deposits.

Scrutiny of Securities Transactions:

Financial institutions and companies issuing bonds or debentures are obligated to report receiving Rs 10 lakh or more from any individual in a financial year for acquiring such securities. This measure is aimed at detecting potential instances of tax evasion or undisclosed income associated with significant cash movements.

Credit Card Transactions:

Several instances of credit card transactions may trigger Income Tax notices:

Cash deposits exceeding Rs 10 lakh for savings accounts and Rs 50 lakh for current accounts, along with substantial withdrawals, may prompt inquiries into the origin and intended use of the funds.
Real estate transactions exceeding Rs 30 lakh may come under the scrutiny of the tax department, which seeks detailed information about the transaction and involved parties.
Investments surpassing Rs 10 lakh in stocks, mutual funds, or bonds may attract scrutiny if the origin of funds appears inconsistent with reported income.
Although the Income Tax department does not actively monitor individual credit card transactions, cash payments exceeding Rs 1 lakh towards credit cards or substantial debt settlements exceeding Rs 10 lakh made in cash may undergo scrutiny and investigation. Ensuring transparency in significant transactions with verifiable fund sources is imperative, as unaccounted cash inflows may trigger investigations.

Mismatch of Declared Income:

Discrepancies between declared income and bank data may prompt notifications from the tax department, highlighting the importance of maintaining accurate financial records.

Foreign Exchange Transactions:

Any purchase of foreign exchange totaling Rs 10 lakh, including travelers’ checks, forex cards, or debit/credit card transactions, must be reported to ensure compliance with tax regulations.

Source: https://www.businesstoday.in/personal-finance/tax/story/real-estate-deals-credit-card-transactions-6-times-one-can-get-income-tax-notice-425280-2024-04-12

category

GST Penalty Overturned by Calcutta High Court Due to Emergency Vehicle Substitution, Showcasing Compliance Flexibility

editor — Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:23:41 +0000

Introduction:

The Calcutta High Court’s decision to quash a GST penalty related to an emergency vehicle change highlights the court’s recognition of flexibility in enforcing compliance.

Facts of the Case:

The petitioner lodged an appeal against the dismissal of their writ petition by the Calcutta HC, which was filed 20 months following an adverse order on June 14, 2022. The delay was attributed to non-receipt of the original order and the demise of the petitioner's first lawyer.
The controversy arose from a tax and penalty imposition concerning the transportation of goods without a valid e-way bill on November 20, 2021. This was due to an emergency vehicle change, preventing the timely amendment of the e-way bill.

Issue:

The central issue revolved around the justification for imposing tax and penalty for the absence of a valid e-way bill during the transportation of goods.

Held:

Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner contended that the delay in filing the writ was genuine and challenged the penalty, citing an emergency vehicle change that hindered the timely amendment of the e-way bill.
Respondent's Argument: The respondent upheld the penalty, highlighting the lack of a valid e-way bill as a compliance failure.
Court Judgment: The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, acknowledging the absence of intent to evade tax and the genuine circumstances causing the appeal's delay. Consequently, the tax and penalty were ordered to be revoked.
Non-resident taxpayers
Persons subject to TDS under section 51 of the CGST Act.

category

Tax Authorities cannot retain the tax deposited under the cancelled GST registration

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:38:08 +0000

Introduction:

In the case of Yogesh Rajendra Mehra v. Principal Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax [Writ Petition No. 1632 of 2024 dated February 20, 2024], the Hon’ble Bombay High Court addressed the issue of whether tax authorities can retain tax deposited under a cancelled GST registration. The court provided significant observations and rulings on this matter.

Facts of the Case:

Mr. Yogesh Rajendra Mehra, a scriptwriter, obtained GST registration on July 19, 2018. However, his registration was cancelled on January 01, 2019, due to non-filing of subsequent returns. Subsequently, Mr. Mehra applied for and obtained a fresh GST registration on March 26, 2022. During the first quarter of 2022, his chartered accountant mistakenly deposited Rs. 1,22,220/- as tax under the cancelled registration instead of the new one. Mr. Mehra then applied for a refund of the erroneously deposited tax.

Issue:

The central issue revolves around whether tax authorities can retain tax deposited under a cancelled GST registration.

Held:

The Bombay High Court held that tax authorities cannot retain tax deposited under a cancelled GST registration. The court emphasized that taxpayers cannot be expected to file returns and deposit tax under an invalid registration number. It was noted that the tax deposited under the cancelled registration was not valid as the registration itself was non-existent. The court also criticized the tax authorities’ rejection of the refund application on technical grounds, ruling that any deficiency in filing an appeal within the prescribed limitation period does not render the appeal barred by limitation. Therefore, the court ordered the refund of the erroneously deposited tax amount of Rs. 1,22,220/- along with permissible interest to Mr. Mehra within four weeks.

category

GSTN Issues Advisory on Automatic HSN-wise Summary Population in GSTR-1 Table 12 from e-Invoices

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:22:53 +0000

The GSTN has released an important Advisory No. 630 dated April 09, 2024, regarding the automatic population of HSN-wise summaries from e-Invoices into Table 12 of GSTR-1.

GSTN is pleased to announce the introduction of a new feature that enables the automatic population of HSN-wise summaries from e-Invoices into Table 12 of GSTR-1 on the GST portal. This feature facilitates the direct drafting of HSN data into Table 12 based on e-Invoice data.

It is important to note that the HSN-wise summary data automatically populated into Table 12 is provided for your convenience. However, it is advised to reconcile this data with your records before final submission.

Any discrepancies or errors identified should be manually corrected or added to Table 12 before the final submission.

For further details, please refer to the Advisory accessible at: Link to Advisory

category

CBDT Urges Officers to Identify Top 30 Cases of TDS Shortfall by June 30, 2024

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:13:23 +0000

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has instructed income tax officers to scrutinize the top 30 cases of insufficient tax deduction at source (TDS) and resolve at least 150 appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax before June 30, 2024.

These directives are outlined in the interim action plan released by the CBDT for the fiscal year 2024-25, delineating the primary focus areas for field formations.

According to a recent communication from the CBDT to its officials, specific Key Result Areas have been identified for timely accomplishment, alongside attending to statutory limitation matters.

The CBDT routinely issues interim action plans to its officials at the onset of each financial year, refining them later in the year to form the final plan.

Additionally, the CBDT has called for seminars and awareness campaigns to be conducted on TDS. Over the years, TDS has emerged as a significant revenue source for the government, surging from Rs 2.13 lakh crore in FY13 to Rs 8.17 lakh crore in FY23.

As part of its interim plan for the current fiscal, the CBDT has also mandated the immediate approval of all pending refunds withheld under Section 241(A) once scrutiny assessments are completed and requisite orders are passed, either immediately or by April 30, 2024.

Furthermore, the CBDT has directed that all information requested by enforcement agencies such as the CBI, SEBI, and Enforcement Directorate before March 31, 2024, must be shared by the end of April. For requests received after April 1, information should be provided within 15 days.

Field officers are also tasked with identifying cases where seized assets are due for release as per Section 132B and facilitating their release by June 30, 2024.

Source: Business Today

category

High Court Advocates Direct Communication, Urges Tax Department to Inform Taxpayers Prior to Action

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:01:01 +0000

Introduction:

Certain demographics, including senior citizens, technologically hesitant individuals, Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), and those prone to forgetfulness, might be unaware of the Income Tax Department’s actions against them. The department initiates proceedings by uploading show-cause notices or summons to its online portal, without directly notifying these taxpayers via email or letter. Consequently, individuals who infrequently check the tax portal, as is common, may face unforeseen penalties and complications. This operational method by the tax authorities has raised concerns about its fairness.

High Court’s Critique:

Recently, the High Court criticized the tax authorities’ approach, highlighting the unreasonableness of expecting taxpayers to constantly monitor the e-portal for updates. In a case concerning the Munjal BCU Centre of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, the Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed a show-cause notice from November 2022. The court emphasized that legal provisions dictate the manner in which notices and orders must be served, rejecting the notion of notices being “presumed” received solely by placement on the e-portal.

Importance of Natural Justice:

An expert underscored the significance of natural justice in legal proceedings, emphasizing the principle of “audi alteram partem,” which requires both parties to be heard. Lack of communication regarding assessments, penalties, or other actions could result in hardships for taxpayers, missed deadlines, and ignorance of their right to respond, thereby increasing burdens for all parties involved.

Case Example: Munjal BCU:

Munjal BCU, dedicated to fostering innovation and startups in Ludhiana, received initial notices and reminders solely through the online tax portal. The court deemed this insufficient opportunity for the organization to present its case.

Historical Context:

Before 2009, the tax department primarily relied on physical mail for communication, transitioning to electronic means later. Placing communications solely on the income tax portal can pose tracking challenges, especially for certain demographics uncomfortable with technology. While portal accessibility is convenient, supplementary notifications via email and/or physical mail are necessary.

Expected Changes:

The court’s decision is expected to prompt the department to communicate through emails for various matters, including notices and summons.

Practitioners’ Concerns:

Tax practitioners have noted issues with recent proceedings, including notices not being visible on the portal and unreasonable response timeframes.

category

Approval of outstanding refunds must be completed by April 30, Income Tax Department.

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 04:45:35 +0000

The Income Tax Department has announced a positive development for individuals awaiting their income tax refunds. They have set a firm deadline of April 30 for the approval of all pending refunds.

Since the opening of the portal for the Assessment Year 2024-25 on April 1, there has been considerable activity, with over 46,000 income tax returns filed within the initial five days. Out of these, close to 3,000 returns have already undergone processing.

The Department has devised an interim action plan for the current fiscal year, outlining specific timelines for addressing various taxpayer-related matters. Immediate attention has been directed towards the approval of pending refunds, particularly those withheld under section 241A due to potential adverse effects on revenue, following the completion of scrutiny assessments and necessary orders. Despite the issuance of refunds exceeding ₹3.36 lakh crore in the fiscal year 2023-24, complaints persist regarding pending refunds from previous fiscal years.

Officials emphasize the importance of approving all pending refunds related to e-returns filed on the Income Tax Business Application (ITBA) for all assessment years by April 30. Additionally, a deadline of June 30 has been set for resolving penalties in at least half of the cases that will become time-barred by March 31, 2025.

Furthermore, attention has been drawn to cases involving Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), with a one-month timeframe provided for disposing of all pending applications as of April 1, 2024, for NIL or lower TDS/TCS. Additionally, orders are expected to be issued by June 30 for cases where TDS surveys were conducted up to March 31, 2024.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/it-department-sets-april-30-as-deadline-for-approval-of-pending-refunds/article68042765.ece

category

GSTN Issues Important Advisory Regarding Reset and Re-filing of GSTR-3B for Certain Taxpayers

editor — Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:06:19 +0000

The GSTN has released an important advisory, numbered 629 and dated April 9, 2024, regarding the reset and re-filing of GSTR-3B for specific taxpayers.

Referring to the option for re-filing GSTR-3B for certain taxpayers, it was observed that discrepancies existed between the saved data in the GST system and the data actually filed, particularly concerning ITC availment and tax liabilities. After thorough examination and discussion by the Grievance Redressal Committee of the GST Council, it was decided to reset these returns, providing affected taxpayers with an opportunity to rectify the discrepancies.

As a result, only the affected taxpayers have been notified via their registered email addresses, and the affected returns are accessible on their respective dashboards for re-filing with accurate data. Those who have received this communication are requested to visit their dashboard and re-submit their GSTR-3B within 15 days.

In case of any difficulty in re-filing, taxpayers are advised to contact their jurisdictional tax officer or raise a ticket on the GST grievance redressal portal.

We deeply regret any inconvenience caused to taxpayers.

The complete advisory can be found at: Link to Advisory

category