CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases |

CBDT Urges Officers to Identify Top 30 Cases of TDS Shortfall by June 30, 2024

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:13:23 +0000

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has instructed income tax officers to scrutinize the top 30 cases of insufficient tax deduction at source (TDS) and resolve at least 150 appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax before June 30, 2024.

These directives are outlined in the interim action plan released by the CBDT for the fiscal year 2024-25, delineating the primary focus areas for field formations.

According to a recent communication from the CBDT to its officials, specific Key Result Areas have been identified for timely accomplishment, alongside attending to statutory limitation matters.

The CBDT routinely issues interim action plans to its officials at the onset of each financial year, refining them later in the year to form the final plan.

Additionally, the CBDT has called for seminars and awareness campaigns to be conducted on TDS. Over the years, TDS has emerged as a significant revenue source for the government, surging from Rs 2.13 lakh crore in FY13 to Rs 8.17 lakh crore in FY23.

As part of its interim plan for the current fiscal, the CBDT has also mandated the immediate approval of all pending refunds withheld under Section 241(A) once scrutiny assessments are completed and requisite orders are passed, either immediately or by April 30, 2024.

Furthermore, the CBDT has directed that all information requested by enforcement agencies such as the CBI, SEBI, and Enforcement Directorate before March 31, 2024, must be shared by the end of April. For requests received after April 1, information should be provided within 15 days.

Field officers are also tasked with identifying cases where seized assets are due for release as per Section 132B and facilitating their release by June 30, 2024.

Source: Business Today

category

Collaborative Audits by Central and State GST Authorities Targeting Businesses

editor — Tue, 09 Apr 2024 06:48:00 +0000

Beginning this fiscal year, there will be a collaborative effort between Central and State Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities to conduct audits within the indirect tax framework.

This joint approach is expected to bring significant advantages to taxpayers by eliminating repetitive notifications and inquiries. Current industry data suggests that around 11,000 cases are either duplicated or entangled in legal disputes due to investigations by both Central and State agencies. Various Central GST zones have issued internal communications instructing officials to collaborate with their state counterparts on audits to ensure better coordination, as per sources.

The concept of conducting audits collaboratively was proposed during a national coordination meeting last month to streamline tax enforcement processes. The directives indicate that Central GST officers should also participate in audits conducted by State GST teams to improve SGST officers’ audit capabilities and facilitate the exchange of crucial compliance information. To support these joint audit efforts, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has instructed each zone to devise a specific framework.

The responsibility for implementation, delegated to zonal heads, aims to optimize time and resources. Experts in the industry believe this initiative will enhance the fairness and efficiency of the audit process, providing a more comprehensive examination that benefits both tax authorities and taxpayers. It will help in avoiding redundant procedures and shield taxpayers from undergoing multiple audits for the same issues.

Furthermore, the CBIC has directed its officers to halt investigations into offenses already under scrutiny by state GST officials or for which notifications have been issued.

Source: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/central-state-gst-officials-to-conduct-joint-audits-of-firms/articleshow/109143298.cms?from=mdr

category

Audit wing of SGST Authority shall keep all proceedings in abeyance if the subject matter is pending before the CGST Authority

editor — Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:57:29 +0000

The Audit division of the State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) Authority is mandated to suspend all actions if a matter is pending before the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Authority, according to a ruling by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Mahabir Prasad Kedia v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax [MAT No. 2388 of 2023 dated January 9, 2024].

Facts:

Mr. Mahabir Prasad Kedia, the Appellant, received an audit memo highlighting several discrepancies.
Upon receiving the audit notice, the Appellant informed the SGST Authority about a show cause notice (SCN) issued by the anti-evasion wing of the CGST Department on March 28, 2023, addressing the same issues for the financial years 2017-2018 to 2021-2022.
The Appellant responded to the Impugned SCN on May 04, 2023, and the matter was pending adjudication.
Despite the Appellant's submission, the audit wing of the SGST Authority overlooked it and proceeded with the matter.
The subject was pending adjudication by the CGST Authority, to whom the Appellant had submitted a reply on May 02, 2023.

Held:

The Calcutta High Court ruled that the SGST Authority's audit division should suspend proceedings concerning the discrepancy noted, as the matter was under consideration by the CGST Authority.
Following this decision, the SGST Authority issued an SCN on December 29, 2023, clarifying that the audit wing should not proceed with the matter.
Consequently, the appeal, along with related applications and writ petitions, was disposed of.
The SGST Authority was directed to halt all proceedings regarding the noted discrepancy, including the show cause notice issued on December 29, 2023, and adhere to the adjudication order from the CGST Authority regarding the Impugned SCN.

category

Form 15CA & 15CB: Key Components and Requirements Explained

editor — Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:01:06 +0000

In today’s globalized economy, where cross-border transactions are commonplace, compliance with tax regulations is critical for both governments and businesses. Form 15CA and 15CB are essential tools introduced by the Indian government to streamline the process of remitting money overseas and ensure adherence to tax laws concerning international transactions.

Globalization and International Transactions: The rise of globalization has led to a significant increase in international trade, investments, and cross-border transactions. Businesses are expanding globally to access new markets and resources, leading to a surge in financial transactions across different jurisdictions.
Tax Compliance Challenges: With the growth of international transactions, ensuring tax compliance has become more challenging for tax authorities. Tax evasion and avoidance have become significant concerns, necessitating stricter regulatory measures.
Need for Regulatory Framework: Governments worldwide are introducing measures to enhance transparency and compliance in cross-border transactions to safeguard the integrity of the tax system and protect stakeholders' interests.
Introduction of Form 15CA and 15CB: Form 15CA and 15CB were introduced by the Indian Income Tax Department to monitor payments to non-residents. Form 15CA is a declaration of remitter, while Form 15CB is a certificate issued by a Chartered Accountant, ensuring compliance with Indian tax laws.
Key Objectives: These forms aim to enhance transparency, ensure tax compliance, and prevent tax evasion by providing details of cross-border transactions and certifying their compliance with relevant laws.
Impact on Globalization: While adding compliance requirements, Form 15CA and 15CB contribute to fostering a conducive environment for global trade by instilling confidence in the tax system and reducing risks associated with international transactions.

Form 15CA:

Overview:

Form 15CA is a declaration document required for remitting funds outside India. It is mandatory for individuals and businesses and can be conveniently filed online through the e-Filing portal.

Types:

Form 15CA has four sections based on the remittance amount and whether a certificate from a Chartered Accountant is obtained.

Form 15CB:

Overview:

Form 15CB is a declaration by a Chartered Accountant certifying compliance with the Income Tax Act, particularly when remittances exceed INR 5 lakh in a financial year.

Sections:

Form 15CB consists of six sections covering certification, remittance details, taxability, and accountant details.

Conclusion:

Navigating Form 15CA and 15CB requirements is essential for businesses and individuals involved in foreign transactions. Understanding these forms’ purpose and procedures ensures compliance with Indian tax regulations, fostering trust and efficiency in the global financial ecosystem.

category

Validity of Assessment Orders in Light of Assessee’s Response

editor — Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:01:20 +0000

The Delhi High Court, in the case of Emco Cables Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India [W.P. 1622 of 2024, February 27, 2024], addressed the issue of the validity of an assessment order when the Assessee’s response hadn’t been duly considered. The court emphasized the importance of taking into account the Assessee’s reply before issuing an assessment order. It was highlighted that if further details were needed, it was the responsibility of the Revenue Department to request them from the Assessee.

Facts of the case:

The case stemmed from a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated September 24, 2023, issued by the Revenue Department against Emco Cables Pvt. Ltd. The notice accused the Assessee of under-declaring output tax, claiming excessive Input Tax Credit (ITC), and claiming ITC from canceled dealers and non-taxpayers. The Assessee responded to the notice with a detailed reply. However, the subsequent order dated December 29, 2023 (Impugned Order), found the Assessee’s reply unsatisfactory and directed further action without adequately considering the response.

Issue:

The central issue revolved around whether an assessment order lacking consideration of the Assessee’s response could be deemed valid.

Held:

The Delhi High Court’s ruling in W.P. 1622 of 2024 outlined the following key points:

Emphasized the obligation of the Proper Officer to thoroughly assess the Assessee's reply before forming an opinion on its sufficiency.
Noted the failure of the Proper Officer to seek additional details from the Assessee if deemed necessary, rather than dismissing the response outright.
Criticized the lack of evidence suggesting that the Proper Officer had indeed reviewed the Assessee's submission.
Set aside the Impugned Order and remanded the case back to the Proper Officer for reconsideration.

category

Guidelines Regarding Cash Limits in Home under Tax Regulations

editor — Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:29:06 +0000

Under the provisions of the Income-Tax Act (ITA) of 1961, there exists no stipulation on the maximum amount of cash permissible to be kept within one’s residence. However, during an income tax inspection, individuals must provide verifiable sources for the cash in their possession.

This particularly applies to funds that must be accounted for in terms of income. If the documentation provided by an individual does not align with the amount of cash found at their residence, income tax authorities possess the authority to penalize them. In such instances, unaccounted cash can be seized, with penalties reaching as high as 137% of the total amount.

It is imperative to consider the subsequent regulations regarding cash, as mandated by the income-tax department:

Prohibition on accepting cash amounts of Rs 20,000 or more for loans or deposits: The income-tax department strictly prohibits individuals from accepting cash sums of Rs 20,000 or higher in relation to loans or deposits.
Compulsory presentation of Permanent Account Number (PAN) for transactions exceeding Rs 50,000: According to the directives of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), individuals are required to furnish a PAN card for transactions involving deposits or withdrawals exceeding Rs 50,000 at a time.
Scrutiny by investigative agencies for cash-based asset transactions surpassing Rs 30 lakh: Indian citizens involved in cash transactions exceeding Rs 30 lakh concerning the purchase or sale of assets may come under scrutiny by investigative agencies.
Investigation into credit or debit card transactions surpassing Rs 1 lakh: Any single transaction exceeding Rs 1 lakh made through credit or debit cards is likely to attract the attention of investigative agencies.
Imposition of a 2% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on withdrawals surpassing Rs 1 crore: Individuals withdrawing over Rs 1 crore in cash from banks within a financial year are subject to a 2% TDS deduction.
Penalty for cash transactions surpassing Rs 20 lakh: Cash transactions exceeding Rs 20 lakh in a year may lead to penalties, while the purchase or sale of cash-based property worth more than Rs 30 lakh could prompt investigations by regulatory bodies.
Restrictions on cash payments: Limits include refraining from making cash purchases exceeding Rs 2 lakh without PAN and Aadhaar details, as well as restrictions on credit or debit card transactions exceeding Rs 1 lakh.
Regulations on familial transactions and loans: Accepting cash sums exceeding Rs 2 lakh from a relative in a single day or obtaining loans exceeding Rs 20,000 in cash from any individual are prohibited.

Adhering to these regulations is essential to avoid legal consequences and ensure full compliance with income tax laws and regulations.

category

Auditor’s Accountability for Audit Trail Reporting

editor — Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:51:21 +0000

An essential aspect of maintaining financial transparency and accuracy is the implementation of an audit trail, which serves as a detailed record tracking the origin and modifications of financial transactions within a system. Auditors are obligated to report on the adequacy and effectiveness of these audit trails, ensuring their integrity and validity.

Significance of Audit Trails

Audit trails offer numerous benefits, including enhanced transparency, improved audit efficiency, fraud detection and prevention, and regulatory compliance across various industries.

Regulations Mandating Reporting on Audit Trails

Specific regulations, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and International Standards on Auditing (ISAs), require auditors to assess and report on audit trails. Industry-specific regulations also dictate additional requirements for audit trail functionality and reporting.

Auditor’s Assessment and Reporting on Audit Trails

Auditors assess various aspects of audit trails, including their existence, functionality, accessibility, retention, and management’s controls. These evaluations contribute to the overall assurance process and provide valuable insights into an entity’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Reporting Mechanisms for Auditors

Auditors report their findings on audit trails through mechanisms like auditor’s reports, management letters, or formal communication to regulatory bodies, depending on the specific situation and identified issues.

Conclusion

Reporting obligations on auditors regarding audit trails are crucial for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of financial information. As regulations evolve to emphasize data integrity, effective reporting by auditors on audit trails remains prominent, promoting transparency and trust in financial statements.

category

Madras HC Instructs Revenue Authority to Expedite GST Rectification Process

editor — Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:24:13 +0000

In the matter of M. Venkataraj versus Assistant Commissioner (ST) [W.P. No. 18949 of 2023 dated November 8, 2023], the Honorable Madras High Court instructed the Revenue Department to address the rectification application submitted by the Petitioner within a timeframe of three months from the issuance of this order.

Facts:

The petitioner, Venkataraj, operates a business registered under the GST with the name M/s. Sri Malleswara Enterprises. The Revenue Department, also known as the Respondent, issued a Show Cause Notice under Section 74(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). The notice alleged that the petitioner was liable to pay taxes under Sections 9(1) and 9(3) of the CGST Act due to the purported failure to disclose the correct turnover concerning the disposal of minerals and seigniorage fee (royalty paid to the government for mineral removal or consumption). Consequently, the Respondent proposed to demand taxes on both forward and reverse charge basis for the alleged suppression of aggregate turnover and seigniorage fees. The Petitioner contested these figures, asserting their accuracy based on the annual returns, and subsequently filed a rectification application on May 30, 2023. However, the Respondent argued that the rectification application was not submitted due to a discrepancy in the dates of receipt and application.

Held:

Upon review, the Honorable Madras High Court in W.P. No. 18949 of 2023 observed that the petitioner’s submission was limited to addressing the rectification application. Consequently, the High Court disposed of the writ petition and instructed the Respondent to address the rectification application filed by the Petitioner within three months from the date of receiving a copy of this order.

category

Guidelines on Cash Limits and Tax Implications for Individuals

editor — Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:26:48 +0000

As per the Income-Tax Act (ITA), 1961, there is no restriction on the amount of money stored in the house; in case of an income tax raid, an individual is required to present the source of the money.

This is especially true for the money should not be unaccounted for in income. In case an individual’s documents do not match the amount of money stored in the house, then income tax officials can penalise the individual. In such cases, income tax personnel are authorised to seize the unaccounted money, and the fine can be as high as up to 137% of the total money.

It is important to take into account the following rules related to cash mandated by the income-tax department:

No Cash Transactions Above Rs 20,000 for Loans or Deposits:

The income-tax department strictly prohibits any individual from accepting an amount of Rs 20,000 or more in cash related to loans or deposits.

PAN Mandatory for Transactions Over Rs 50,000:

As per the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), individuals must provide a PAN card for deposits or withdrawals of over Rs 50,000 at a time.

Scrutiny for Cash-Based Asset Transactions Over Rs 30 Lakh:

Indian citizens engaging in the purchase or sale of assets through cash of more than Rs 30 lakh may come under the lens of investigating agencies.

Investigation into Credit-Debit Card Transactions Over Rs 1 Lakh:

Any payment transaction exceeding Rs 1 lakh paid through credit or debit cards at a time is likely to draw the attention of investigating agencies.

2% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) for Withdrawals Exceeding Rs 1 Crore:

Individuals withdrawing more than Rs 1 crore in cash from the bank in a financial year are subject to shell out a 2% TDS.

Penalty for Cash Transactions Over Rs 20 Lakh:

Cash transactions exceeding Rs 20 lakh in a year are likely to attract penalties, while the purchase and sale of cash property of more than Rs 30 lakh can draw the attention of investigative agencies.

Caps on Cash Payments:

Limits include not paying over Rs 2 lakh in cash for purchases without PAN and Aadhaar information and restrictions on transactions more than Rs 1 lakh with credit-debit cards.

Family Transactions and Loans:

Receiving over Rs 2 lakh in cash from a relative in a day or taking a loan of more than Rs 20,000 in cash from any individual else is prohibited.

An individual is required to be abreast of these rules to avoid any legal repercussions and ensure total compliance with the income tax rules and regulations.

category

Filing of Form 10-IEA for Income-Tax Return

editor — Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:47:20 +0000

The Income-Tax Department has introduced Form 10-IEA for individuals who wish to switch back to the old tax regime from the new one. Here’s a breakdown of what you need to know about this form and its implications:

Introduction of New Tax Regime: The new tax regime was initially introduced under the Union Budget 2020. However, it was made the default tax regime by the Budget 2023.
Default Selection: By default, individuals are placed under the new tax regime unless they choose to opt-out.
Need for Form 10-IEA: Individuals who want to revert to the old tax regime need to fill out Form 10-IEA. This form requires various details, including PAN, tax status (individual, HUF, etc.), and any tax benefits claimed for the International Financial Services Centre (IFSC). It also asks for the taxpayer's history of switching between tax regimes.
Deadline: Form 10-IEA must be submitted before the tax filing deadline of July 31, 2024. Failure to do so could result in the taxpayer being unable to switch to the old regime later in the year.
Implications: Switching back to the old tax regime may be beneficial for individuals who want to claim deductions and exemptions not allowed under the new regime, such as those under Section 80C, Section 80D, and deductions for home loan interest, education, house rent, and LTA.
Tax Rates: Under the new tax regime, lower-income groups benefit from lower tax rates. However, those earning between Rs 5 lakh and Rs 7.5 lakh may face higher taxes compared to the old regime due to fewer deductions and exemptions.
Clarity Awaited: There is still ambiguity regarding whether Form 10-IEA is mandatory for all individuals or only for certain categories like businessmen and self-employed individuals. Further clarity on the procedure for opting out of the tax regime is awaited from the Income-Tax Department.
Professional Income: Taxpayers filing under ITR-4 (for individuals with business or professional income) must submit Form 10-IEA to opt out of the new tax regime.
Importance of Details: Although providing past details may seem cumbersome, it's crucial for ensuring accurate claims of deductions and exemptions. Self-employed individuals are allowed to switch back to the old tax regime only once in their lifetime.
Consequences of Non-Compliance: Failing to submit Form 10-IEA before the deadline could result in being unable to file belated tax returns under the old tax regime. This means forfeiting tax exemptions and being considered under the new tax regime automatically.

In summary, Form 10-IEA is a crucial document for individuals wishing to switch back to the old tax regime from the new one. It’s essential to understand its requirements and implications to make informed decisions about tax filing.

category