CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases |

Tax Authorities cannot retain the tax deposited under the cancelled GST registration

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:38:08 +0000

Introduction:

In the case of Yogesh Rajendra Mehra v. Principal Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax [Writ Petition No. 1632 of 2024 dated February 20, 2024], the Hon’ble Bombay High Court addressed the issue of whether tax authorities can retain tax deposited under a cancelled GST registration. The court provided significant observations and rulings on this matter.

Facts of the Case:

Mr. Yogesh Rajendra Mehra, a scriptwriter, obtained GST registration on July 19, 2018. However, his registration was cancelled on January 01, 2019, due to non-filing of subsequent returns. Subsequently, Mr. Mehra applied for and obtained a fresh GST registration on March 26, 2022. During the first quarter of 2022, his chartered accountant mistakenly deposited Rs. 1,22,220/- as tax under the cancelled registration instead of the new one. Mr. Mehra then applied for a refund of the erroneously deposited tax.

Issue:

The central issue revolves around whether tax authorities can retain tax deposited under a cancelled GST registration.

Held:

The Bombay High Court held that tax authorities cannot retain tax deposited under a cancelled GST registration. The court emphasized that taxpayers cannot be expected to file returns and deposit tax under an invalid registration number. It was noted that the tax deposited under the cancelled registration was not valid as the registration itself was non-existent. The court also criticized the tax authorities’ rejection of the refund application on technical grounds, ruling that any deficiency in filing an appeal within the prescribed limitation period does not render the appeal barred by limitation. Therefore, the court ordered the refund of the erroneously deposited tax amount of Rs. 1,22,220/- along with permissible interest to Mr. Mehra within four weeks.

category

GSTN Issues Advisory on Automatic HSN-wise Summary Population in GSTR-1 Table 12 from e-Invoices

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:22:53 +0000

The GSTN has released an important Advisory No. 630 dated April 09, 2024, regarding the automatic population of HSN-wise summaries from e-Invoices into Table 12 of GSTR-1.

GSTN is pleased to announce the introduction of a new feature that enables the automatic population of HSN-wise summaries from e-Invoices into Table 12 of GSTR-1 on the GST portal. This feature facilitates the direct drafting of HSN data into Table 12 based on e-Invoice data.

It is important to note that the HSN-wise summary data automatically populated into Table 12 is provided for your convenience. However, it is advised to reconcile this data with your records before final submission.

Any discrepancies or errors identified should be manually corrected or added to Table 12 before the final submission.

For further details, please refer to the Advisory accessible at: Link to Advisory

category

CBDT Urges Officers to Identify Top 30 Cases of TDS Shortfall by June 30, 2024

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:13:23 +0000

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has instructed income tax officers to scrutinize the top 30 cases of insufficient tax deduction at source (TDS) and resolve at least 150 appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax before June 30, 2024.

These directives are outlined in the interim action plan released by the CBDT for the fiscal year 2024-25, delineating the primary focus areas for field formations.

According to a recent communication from the CBDT to its officials, specific Key Result Areas have been identified for timely accomplishment, alongside attending to statutory limitation matters.

The CBDT routinely issues interim action plans to its officials at the onset of each financial year, refining them later in the year to form the final plan.

Additionally, the CBDT has called for seminars and awareness campaigns to be conducted on TDS. Over the years, TDS has emerged as a significant revenue source for the government, surging from Rs 2.13 lakh crore in FY13 to Rs 8.17 lakh crore in FY23.

As part of its interim plan for the current fiscal, the CBDT has also mandated the immediate approval of all pending refunds withheld under Section 241(A) once scrutiny assessments are completed and requisite orders are passed, either immediately or by April 30, 2024.

Furthermore, the CBDT has directed that all information requested by enforcement agencies such as the CBI, SEBI, and Enforcement Directorate before March 31, 2024, must be shared by the end of April. For requests received after April 1, information should be provided within 15 days.

Field officers are also tasked with identifying cases where seized assets are due for release as per Section 132B and facilitating their release by June 30, 2024.

Source: Business Today

category

High Court Advocates Direct Communication, Urges Tax Department to Inform Taxpayers Prior to Action

editor — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:01:01 +0000

Introduction:

Certain demographics, including senior citizens, technologically hesitant individuals, Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), and those prone to forgetfulness, might be unaware of the Income Tax Department’s actions against them. The department initiates proceedings by uploading show-cause notices or summons to its online portal, without directly notifying these taxpayers via email or letter. Consequently, individuals who infrequently check the tax portal, as is common, may face unforeseen penalties and complications. This operational method by the tax authorities has raised concerns about its fairness.

High Court’s Critique:

Recently, the High Court criticized the tax authorities’ approach, highlighting the unreasonableness of expecting taxpayers to constantly monitor the e-portal for updates. In a case concerning the Munjal BCU Centre of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, the Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed a show-cause notice from November 2022. The court emphasized that legal provisions dictate the manner in which notices and orders must be served, rejecting the notion of notices being “presumed” received solely by placement on the e-portal.

Importance of Natural Justice:

An expert underscored the significance of natural justice in legal proceedings, emphasizing the principle of “audi alteram partem,” which requires both parties to be heard. Lack of communication regarding assessments, penalties, or other actions could result in hardships for taxpayers, missed deadlines, and ignorance of their right to respond, thereby increasing burdens for all parties involved.

Case Example: Munjal BCU:

Munjal BCU, dedicated to fostering innovation and startups in Ludhiana, received initial notices and reminders solely through the online tax portal. The court deemed this insufficient opportunity for the organization to present its case.

Historical Context:

Before 2009, the tax department primarily relied on physical mail for communication, transitioning to electronic means later. Placing communications solely on the income tax portal can pose tracking challenges, especially for certain demographics uncomfortable with technology. While portal accessibility is convenient, supplementary notifications via email and/or physical mail are necessary.

Expected Changes:

The court’s decision is expected to prompt the department to communicate through emails for various matters, including notices and summons.

Practitioners’ Concerns:

Tax practitioners have noted issues with recent proceedings, including notices not being visible on the portal and unreasonable response timeframes.

category

Reinstatement of GST Numbers Contingent on Clearing Dues Highlights Tax Adherence and Procedural Flexibility

editor — Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:22:39 +0000

Introduction:

This case law concerns a judgment from the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, which offers a lifeline for GST compliance by restoring GST registration upon the settlement of dues.

Facts of the Case:

The petitioner’s GST registration was canceled following their failure to respond to a show cause notice issued by tax authorities on November 16, 2021. Subsequently, the petitioner’s appeal was dismissed due to their absence before the Appellate Authority.

Issue:

The main issue was whether the petitioner’s GST registration, canceled due to non-compliance with the show cause notice and absence during the appeal, could be reinstated upon their commitment to clear outstanding taxes, penalties, and interest as per GST laws.

Petitioner’s Argument:

The petitioner advocated for the restoration of their GST number, pledging to settle all dues, including taxes, penalties, and interest, in accordance with the GST Act, 2017, upon reinstatement.

Respondent’s Argument:

The Respondent, represented by the Advocate General, did not oppose the petitioner’s proposal to settle dues and reinstate the GST number.

Held:

Considering the unique circumstances and lack of objection from the Respondent, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh disposed of the case by instructing the petitioner to approach the concerned Officer for GST number restoration within seven days. Upon restoration, the petitioner must settle taxes, penalties, and interest within another seven days, as mandated by the GST Act, 2017.

category

Tax Liability cannot be imposed merely because the financial statement did not provide State-wise turnover

editor — Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:14:35 +0000

The imposition of tax liability solely based on the absence of state-wise turnover information in financial statements has been contested in the legal realm. This matter was addressed by the Hon’ble Madras High Court in a recent case involving Tvl. Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) [WP No. 3534 OF 2024, dated February 16, 2024].

Facts:

Tvl. Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) operated as a private general insurance firm, specializing in insurance services. On August 16, 2021, the Petitioner was served with an audit notice by the Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) (FAC) (“the Respondent”). In response, the Petitioner diligently furnished the necessary documents and addressed the discrepancies highlighted in the audit reports. Subsequently, after issuing both an intimation and a show cause notice (“the SCN”), the Competent Authority issued the assessment order on December 30, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”).

Within the Impugned Order, the issue of defect No. 10 arose, relating to variations in turnover between the Profit & Loss account and balance sheet, as opposed to the figures in GSTR-9. The Petitioner explained that these disparities stemmed from the inclusion of Pan-India operations in the financial statements, whereas GSTR-9 solely focused on turnover within Tamil Nadu. The Petitioner even provided a certificate from a Chartered Accountant, specifically outlining the turnover within Tamil Nadu, amounting to Rs. 80,89,05,068/-. However, despite this clarification and despite the Petitioner having already paid taxes on the stated turnover, the Respondent imposed State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) and Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) at 18% each (36% combined) on the aforementioned turnover.

Dissatisfied with the assessment order, the Petitioner sought recourse by filing a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras.

Top of Form

Issue:

The central question revolves around whether tax liability can be established solely due to the absence of state-wise turnover information in financial statements.

Held:

In its ruling on Writ Petition No. 3534 OF 2024, the Hon’ble Madras High Court made the following determinations:

The Court acknowledged the variation in turnover for entities operating across multiple states, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing total turnover from state-wise turnover.
It criticized the Competent Authority's decision to impose GST at a higher rate of 36% instead of the appropriate 18%, despite the Petitioner having already paid tax on the turnover in question.
The Impugned Order was deemed invalid and the case was remanded to the Respondent for reconsideration.
Furthermore, the Court directed the Respondent to afford the Petitioner a fair opportunity, including a personal hearing, and instructed issuance of a fresh assessment order within a maximum period of two months, in compliance with legal provisions.

category

Form 15CA & 15CB: Key Components and Requirements Explained

editor — Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:01:06 +0000

In today’s globalized economy, where cross-border transactions are commonplace, compliance with tax regulations is critical for both governments and businesses. Form 15CA and 15CB are essential tools introduced by the Indian government to streamline the process of remitting money overseas and ensure adherence to tax laws concerning international transactions.

Globalization and International Transactions: The rise of globalization has led to a significant increase in international trade, investments, and cross-border transactions. Businesses are expanding globally to access new markets and resources, leading to a surge in financial transactions across different jurisdictions.
Tax Compliance Challenges: With the growth of international transactions, ensuring tax compliance has become more challenging for tax authorities. Tax evasion and avoidance have become significant concerns, necessitating stricter regulatory measures.
Need for Regulatory Framework: Governments worldwide are introducing measures to enhance transparency and compliance in cross-border transactions to safeguard the integrity of the tax system and protect stakeholders' interests.
Introduction of Form 15CA and 15CB: Form 15CA and 15CB were introduced by the Indian Income Tax Department to monitor payments to non-residents. Form 15CA is a declaration of remitter, while Form 15CB is a certificate issued by a Chartered Accountant, ensuring compliance with Indian tax laws.
Key Objectives: These forms aim to enhance transparency, ensure tax compliance, and prevent tax evasion by providing details of cross-border transactions and certifying their compliance with relevant laws.
Impact on Globalization: While adding compliance requirements, Form 15CA and 15CB contribute to fostering a conducive environment for global trade by instilling confidence in the tax system and reducing risks associated with international transactions.

Form 15CA:

Overview:

Form 15CA is a declaration document required for remitting funds outside India. It is mandatory for individuals and businesses and can be conveniently filed online through the e-Filing portal.

Types:

Form 15CA has four sections based on the remittance amount and whether a certificate from a Chartered Accountant is obtained.

Form 15CB:

Overview:

Form 15CB is a declaration by a Chartered Accountant certifying compliance with the Income Tax Act, particularly when remittances exceed INR 5 lakh in a financial year.

Sections:

Form 15CB consists of six sections covering certification, remittance details, taxability, and accountant details.

Conclusion:

Navigating Form 15CA and 15CB requirements is essential for businesses and individuals involved in foreign transactions. Understanding these forms’ purpose and procedures ensures compliance with Indian tax regulations, fostering trust and efficiency in the global financial ecosystem.

category

Validity of Assessment Orders in Light of Assessee’s Response

editor — Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:01:20 +0000

The Delhi High Court, in the case of Emco Cables Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India [W.P. 1622 of 2024, February 27, 2024], addressed the issue of the validity of an assessment order when the Assessee’s response hadn’t been duly considered. The court emphasized the importance of taking into account the Assessee’s reply before issuing an assessment order. It was highlighted that if further details were needed, it was the responsibility of the Revenue Department to request them from the Assessee.

Facts of the case:

The case stemmed from a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated September 24, 2023, issued by the Revenue Department against Emco Cables Pvt. Ltd. The notice accused the Assessee of under-declaring output tax, claiming excessive Input Tax Credit (ITC), and claiming ITC from canceled dealers and non-taxpayers. The Assessee responded to the notice with a detailed reply. However, the subsequent order dated December 29, 2023 (Impugned Order), found the Assessee’s reply unsatisfactory and directed further action without adequately considering the response.

Issue:

The central issue revolved around whether an assessment order lacking consideration of the Assessee’s response could be deemed valid.

Held:

The Delhi High Court’s ruling in W.P. 1622 of 2024 outlined the following key points:

Emphasized the obligation of the Proper Officer to thoroughly assess the Assessee's reply before forming an opinion on its sufficiency.
Noted the failure of the Proper Officer to seek additional details from the Assessee if deemed necessary, rather than dismissing the response outright.
Criticized the lack of evidence suggesting that the Proper Officer had indeed reviewed the Assessee's submission.
Set aside the Impugned Order and remanded the case back to the Proper Officer for reconsideration.

category

Prohibition of Concurrent Proceedings for the Same Period under GST Legislation

editor — Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:15:17 +0000

Introduction:

In a significant judgment, the Hon’ble Guwahati High Court addressed the issue of whether simultaneous proceedings for the same period under both the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (SGST Act) are permissible. The court, in the case of Subhash Agarwalla v. State of Assam [Case No. WP(C)/ 683/2024 dated February 12, 2024], ruled that the initiation of proceedings under either the CGST Act or the SGST Act precludes the initiation of parallel proceedings for the same period under the other act. Consequently, any order issued under one act remains suspended until the specified returnable date. This article examines the case of Subhash Agarwalla v. State of Assam, providing insights into its background, the court’s decision, and its implications for the broader landscape of GST law.

Facts:

Subhash Agarwalla (“the Petitioner”) received a Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated November 23, 2022 (“the Impugned SCN”) from the SGST Authority under Section 73 of the SGST Act, regarding potential liabilities for the Financial Year 2017-2018. Subsequently, another Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated April 27, 2023 (“the Impugned SCN”) was issued by the CGST Authority, covering the Financial Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020. Both notices alleged the improper utilization of Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) by the Petitioner, violating Section 16(4) of the CGST Act/SGST Act. Following the Impugned SCN, the CGST Authority issued an Order-in-Original on November 14, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”). Subsequently, the SGST Authority passed its own Order-in-Original on December 11, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”).

Issue:

The primary issue at hand is whether initiating two parallel proceedings for the same period is permissible under GST Law.

Held:

The Hon’ble Guwahati High Court, in Case No. WP(C)/ 683/2024, held the following:

Conclusion:

The ruling by the Guwahati High Court establishes a precedent, emphasizing the prohibition of simultaneous proceedings for the same period under the CGST and SGST Acts. This decision reflects the legislative intent to prevent redundancy and ensure an efficient adjudication process. As businesses navigate GST compliance complexities, understanding such legal nuances is crucial to mitigate unnecessary legal complications.

category

GST Application to Educational and Allied Services

editor — Fri, 22 Mar 2024 07:40:25 +0000

Exploring GST Implications on Educational Services

Are you operating a bus transport service catering to schools for student transportation? Wondering about GST applicability on such services? Let’s delve into the specifics of GST laws concerning educational services and allied sectors.

School Transport Services:

According to GST law, specified in Notification 12/2017, no GST is applicable on transportation services provided by an educational institution or to an educational institution for the conveyance of its students, staff, and faculty members.
This exemption encompasses all educational institutions offering services from preschool education up to higher secondary school or its equivalent.
Hence, there's no requirement to levy GST on school bus services extended to transport students, staff, and faculty members.

Understanding GST on Miscellaneous Educational Services

Contemplating enrolling in a French language course at a foreign language school in India? Curious about the GST implications on course fees? Let’s clarify the scenario.

Foreign Language Course:

Deciphering GST on Specialized Coaching Services

Considering enrolling your child in cricket coaching at a private sports coaching center? Puzzled about the GST imposition on coaching fees? Let’s unravel the situation.

Sports Coaching Services:

Analyzing GST on Private Tuition

Are you a student seeking private tuition for Mathematics and Science subjects? Unsure about the GST applicability on tuition fees? Let’s analyze the scenario.

Private Tuition Services:

Educational Service	GST Applicability
School Transport	No GST
Foreign Language	18% GST
Sports Coaching	GST applies
Private Tuition	18% GST (if turnover exceeds threshold)

category