CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases |

High Court Decision: IGST Credit Reversal

editor — Sat, 08 Jun 2024 06:47:59 +0000

Introduction:

In a recent landmark judgment, the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court addressed the contentious issue of whether Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) credit needs to be reversed when mistakenly claimed instead of Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) and State Goods and Services Tax (SGST). This ruling has significant implications for taxpayers across the country.

Facts of the Case:

M/s Cosyn Limited, the petitioner, availed IGST credit amounting to Rs. 1,50,53,298/- in February 2018. However, discrepancies arose regarding the invoices related to the claimed ITC, leading to an assessment order against the petitioner for utilizing IGST credit for payment of SGST liabilities.

Issue:

The central issue in this case revolved around whether IGST credit utilized for SGST payments should be reversed and transferred to the respective state.

Held:

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court, in M.A.T. NO. 2411 OF 2023, held that:

Conclusion:

This judgment provides clarity on the treatment of IGST credit utilized for SGST payments, offering relief to taxpayers facing similar disputes.

category

Taxpayers Get Choice in Valuing Startup Investments (Angel Tax)

editor — Mon, 15 Apr 2024 05:00:14 +0000

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of taxpayers, allowing them to select the method for valuing investments received from angel investors. This comes after a disagreement between a company (Agra Portfolio) and the Income Tax Department (IT Department) regarding the valuation of shares issued to an angel investor.

What is Angel Tax?

Angel tax refers to the tax levied on the difference between the fair market value (FMV) of shares allotted to an angel investor and the amount the investor paid for them.

The Case:

Agra Portfolio used the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method to determine the FMV of the shares. DCF estimates an investment’s value by considering its projected future cash flows. The IT Department, however, rejected this valuation and used the Net Asset Value (NAV) method instead. NAV calculates the value per share by dividing the company’s net assets (assets minus liabilities) by the total number of shares.

Court’s Decision:

The Court clarified that while the IT Department can question a taxpayer’s valuation report, it cannot impose a different valuation method. The Court emphasized that the Income Tax Act and Rules grant taxpayers the sole authority to choose the valuation method.

The IT Department can still scrutinize the report and conduct its own valuation (using the taxpayer’s chosen method) to challenge the taxpayer’s assessment.

Outcome:

The Court ordered the IT Department to re-evaluate Agra Portfolio’s case using the DCF method as chosen by the company.

This decision offers greater flexibility to startups and investors when determining the FMV of shares for angel investments.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/angel-tax-valuation-method-solely-assessees-choice-says-delhi-hc/article68043342.ece

category

Income Tax Department Cracks Down on Unfiled Returns: 1.52 Crore Individuals Targeted

editor — Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:21:28 +0000

Large Discrepancy Between Taxpayers and Filed Returns

The Income Tax Department is launching a campaign to target individuals who haven’t filed their income tax returns (ITR) despite meeting filing requirements. According to a report in the Economic Times, the department has identified 1.52 crore such individuals.

Data Discrepancies Trigger Action

This initiative stems from a data analysis by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which revealed a significant gap between the total number of taxpayers (8.9 crore in financial year 2022-23) and the number of ITRs filed (7.4 crore, including revised returns). This suggests that potentially 1.97 crore individuals might not have filed their returns even though tax was deducted at source (TDS) from their income.

Focus on High-Value Transactions

The I-T Department is particularly interested in individuals with high bank transactions linked to their PAN cards. Officials will be contacting these individuals to explain the importance of filing ITRs. Additionally, the CBDT has identified nearly 9,000 potential taxpayers who might have made high-value purchases or cash deposits and will be sending them tax notices.

Consequences for Non-Compliance

Individuals who deliberately neglected to file returns will face penalties. However, those with genuine reasons for the sudden increase in income can submit an explanation or file a return to rectify the situation.

Data Analytics Boosts Tax Collection

The Income Tax Department’s access to a vast amount of data has proven instrumental in identifying non-filers and uncovering inconsistencies. This focus on data analysis is credited with contributing to a significant rise (19.88%) in net direct tax collection, exceeding ₹18.90 lakh crore as of March 17th.

Source: https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/it-department-to-tap-1-52-crore-individuals-for-income-tax-return-filing-heres-why-101713003056572.html

category

Delhi High Court Facilitates Refund Requests for Overpaid Taxes, Streamlining Procedural Deadlines for Taxpayers!

editor — Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:38:03 +0000

If the Tax Department has demanded payment for taxes from you because your supplier failed to remit them, and later it is discovered that your supplier did, indeed, pay the taxes, you should apply for a refund.

Facts of the Case & Timelines:

The petitioner was compelled to pay taxes on certain invoices for the fiscal year 2019-2020, due to the delayed filing of returns by Respondent No. 3.

Subsequently, it was revealed that Respondent No. 3 had filed returns and claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) for the same invoices, resulting in double payment. Consequently, the petitioner sought a refund for the excess payment.

Issue:

The main issue revolved around whether the petitioner is eligible for a refund of the tax paid under the assumption of non-compliance by Respondent No. 3, leading to double payment.

Petitioner’s Argument:

The petitioner contended that they were compelled to make the tax payment due to the initial non-compliance by Respondent No. 3. With the subsequent filing of returns, they asserted their right to a refund of the tax paid for the mentioned invoices.

Respondent’s Argument:

The respondent argued against the petitioner’s refund claim, stating that it was not entertained because the petitioner had not filed a proper refund application as required by Section 54 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017.

Held:

The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to submit an appropriate refund application in accordance with Section 54 of the Act. Furthermore, it decreed that the period from 01.03.2020 to 28.02.2023, as well as the period from the filing of the petition (19.01.2024) until the present date, should be excluded when calculating the limitation period for submitting a refund application.

The court refrained from discussing the merits of the case and reserved the right to adjudicate the refund claim according to the law.

category